Deficiency Index

Mi Casa Nursing Center

Mesa, Arizona · CCN 035120

23 surveys since 2010, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
88
Surveys
23
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse2

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file13/23

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
180
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA
County
Maricopa
Medicare-certified since
1985

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
1
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 42 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Arizona.

Last survey on record

Jul 20, 2026

112 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.843.68
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.78—
Annual nurse turnover51.3%44.1%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$14,380 across 1 penalty
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG13.8%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1765.4%E830.8%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 26 of the 88 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6003×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6772×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • F7252×

    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5611×

    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Mi Casa Nursing Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jul 20, 2026

    Based on observations, interviews, clinical record review, weather data review, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one resident (#109) who was assessed to have poor safety awareness and required assistance with mobility, while in the courtyard during extreme summer temperatures. Sampled residents for accidents were 3. As a result, Resident #109 remained outdoors for an undetermined period of time in temperatures reaching 103 F and sustained second-degree burns to both thighs requiring emergency medical treatment at the hospital.Findings include:Resident #109 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, muscle weakness, cognitive communication… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF690Apr 4, 2025

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to provide care and services related to constipation for one resident (#12); and failed to ensure catheter care was provided to one resident (#46) as ordered by the physician. The deficient practice could result in complications and as well as pain and discomfort. Findings include: Resident #12 was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis of intracranial injury with loss of consciousness, full incontinence of feces, and diffuse traumatic brain injury without loss of consciousness. Resident #12 was documented as being alert but altered, difficult to assess due to not following commands, moans, but no meaningful conversation. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Apr 4, 2025

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to follow proper food handling practices while distributing beverages. This deficient practice can result in contamination of resident beverages, and an increased risk of food-borne related illness. An observation was conducted on a hall with six residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), on April 1, 2025 at approximately 11:39 a.m. A staff member retrieved an uncovered beverage from the bedside table, and delivered the glass and meal to a resident room. Simultaneously, a second staff member returned from a resident room on the far end of the hallway, and retrieved a meal tray which contained a cup of coffee, glass of water and juice, which were all uncovered. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Apr 4, 2025

    Based on clinical records, observation, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were in place for one resident (#2). This deficient practice can result in transmission of preventable illness to residents and staff. Findings include, Resident # 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that include quadriplegia, legal blindness, and aphasia (difficulty speaking). A fall mat care plan, initiated on June 26, 2021, revealed the resident was at risk for falls related to a history of falls. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the Staff Assessment for Mental Status ability to make decisions regarding tasks of daily life was severely impaired. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF725Jan 30, 2025

    Based on documentation, staff and resident interviews, and the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that adequate staffing was available to provide for the residents needs and care timely. The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving the care needed. Findings include: Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side, repeated falls, obesity, and chronic kidney disease. The baseline care plan dated February 3, 2024 revealed that the resident is at risk for skin breakdown. Interventions included to clean and dry skin after each incontinent episode. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 88 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 20, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 18, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 9, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 5, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 4, 2025Standard6 findings
  • Jan 30, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 3, 2025Complaint4 findings
  • Jun 5, 2024Complaint2 findings
Show the 15 earlier surveys
  • Jun 8, 2023Standard1 finding
  • Apr 20, 2022Standard7 findings
  • Nov 19, 2021Complaint5 findings
  • Sep 22, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Aug 11, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 5, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Dec 19, 2019Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Oct 26, 2018Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Jul 27, 2017Standard3 findings
  • Jun 23, 2016Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Mar 11, 2015Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Dec 5, 2013—8 findings
  • Nov 9, 2012—11 findings
  • Sep 9, 2011—2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 18, 2010—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction