Deficiency Index

Memorial Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Dumas, Texas · CCN 45F199

16 surveys since 2011, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
47
Surveys
16
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse2

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file13/16

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
46
Ownership
Government - Hospital district
Chain
Independent
County
Moore · rural
Medicare-certified since
1988

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=8, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jun 26, 2025

501 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.594.31
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.42—

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD5100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 5 of the 47 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5782×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

  • F6561×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F7611×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F8801×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Memorial Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF656Aug 13, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that meets professional standards of quality and that included measurable objectives and time frames for 3 of 16 (Residents #20, 29, and 31) residents reviewed for care plans.The facility failed to ensure Resident #20's daily use of compression socks had been included in the care- plan. There was no documentation in the care plan of measurable objectives, interventions, or timeframes for how staff would meet this need.The facility failed to ensure Resident #29 and #31's DNR status was included in the resident's care plan.These failures to accurately develop and implement a care plan could result in staff not being aware of critical… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Aug 13, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 16 residents (Resident # 20) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to follow physician orders and did not apply Compression socks as ordered for Resident # 20. This failure could place residents at risk of staff not being aware of needed care to maintain optimum health and placing them at risk for injury and/or deterioration in their condition. Findings included: Record review of Resident # 20 's face sheet printed 08/12/2026 revealed an [AGE] year-old female. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF578Jun 26, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents had the right to formulate an advanced directive for 2 (Resident #1 and #14) of 17 residents reviewed for advanced directives. Resident #1 had a DNR dated [DATE] (signed by the physician) in her record that was missing information in the Two Witness section. Resident #14 had a DNR dated [DATE] (signed by the physician) in her record that was missing information in the Two Witness section. The facility's failure could place residents a risk for not receiving healthcare as per their own or their legal representatives wishes. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF656Jun 26, 2025

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights and that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 (Resident #25) of 13 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to include Resident #25's antidepressant medication in her care plan dated 05/19/25. This failure could lead to residents not receiving needed care and/or receiving improper care/treatment. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF761May 15, 2024

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 2 of 2 medication carts (Medication Cart-Hall200/300 and Medication cart 400/500) reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure that there no lose pills, expired medications, and labels were legible. -2.5 pills found in medication cart for Hall 200/300 -2 bottles of expired medications found in medication cart for Hall 400/500. Findings included: Observation on 05/13/24 at 09:15 AM revealed Medication cart for 200 and 300 Hall. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 47 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 13, 2026Standard2 findings
  • Jun 26, 2025Standard2 findings
  • May 15, 2024Standard1 finding
  • Apr 5, 2023Standard2 findings
  • Feb 24, 2022Standard1 finding
  • Dec 23, 2020Complaint3 findings
  • Dec 21, 2020Infection control3 findings
  • Aug 12, 2020Complaint3 findings
Show the 8 earlier surveys
  • Jan 16, 2020Standard10 findings
  • Oct 26, 2017Standard2 findings
  • Mar 24, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 14, 2015Standard6 findings
  • Feb 26, 2014Standard2 findings
  • Mar 28, 2012—2 findings
  • Feb 23, 2012—3 findings · 2 harm
  • Apr 6, 2011—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction