Deficiency Index

Medilodge of Cheboygan

Cheboygan, Michigan · CCN 235566

36 surveys since 2010, 8 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
125
Surveys
36
Harm or worse
8
Immediate jeopardy
3
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy3

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file30/36

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
85
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
MEDILODGE
County
Cheboygan · rural
Medicare-certified since
1995

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 81 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Michigan.

Last survey on record

Apr 15, 2026

208 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.713.70
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.28—
Annual nurse turnover36.8%46.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$29,348 across 1 penalty
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG313.0%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1982.6%E14.3%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 23 of the 125 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6844×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6863×

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

  • F5502×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F7592×

    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Medilodge of Cheboygan, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Nov 7, 2025

    This deficiency pertains to intake #2661622Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the right of one Resident (R1) to be free from physical and verbal abuse by a staff member of three residents reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice resulted in psychosocial harm including feelings of humiliation and fear based on the reasonable-person concept. Findings include:A facility-reported incident (FRI) investigation summary submitted to the state agency on 11/3/25 disclosed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A and CNA B witnessed CNA C abuse Resident #1 (R1) while rendering post-fall assistance to R1 on 10/26/25. The facility investigation substantiated the abuse. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Sep 26, 2024

    This citation pertains to intakes MI00147076 and MI00147197. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate assessments and communication for change in condition for one Resident (#2) of three residents reviewed for change in condition, resulting in harm when Resident #2 was transferred to the hospital for mental status changes, found to have a severe wound infection and underwent subsequent intravenous antibiotic administration and surgical intervention. Findings include: Resident #2 (R2) Review of R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment, dated 6/24/2024, revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including lumbar fracture, diabetes, anxiety and dementia. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Mar 11, 2024

    Intake #MI00143052 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assess, monitor, document, and provide treatment per professional standards of practice for one (resident #3) of one resident reviewed for diabetes management, resulting in diabetic ketoacidosis (emergent condition resulting from prolonged elevated blood sugar levels), hospitalization and death. Findings include: Resident #3 (R3) Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R3, revealed the most recent admission to the facility was on 10/20/23 post fall at home with diagnoses including wedge compression fracture T5-T6, pelvis fracture, stage 4 sacral pressure ulcer, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, diabetes type II, peripheral vascular disease, colostomy, chronic kidney disease stage 3 and prior… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Jun 14, 2022

    This citation pertains to Intake #MI 783. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify, assess and treat a sutured wound, following admission, for one Resident (#1) of one reviewed for wounds. This deficient practice resulted in a re-hospitalization , infection, and prolonged healing. Findings include: According to the Admission Record, printed on 6/13/22, Resident #1 was admitted to the facility, from an acute care hospital, on 4/13/22, with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Resident #1 was discharged on [DATE], to an acute care hospital. The Nursing Admission Evaluation, dated 4/13/22 (part one), and 4/14/22 (parts two and three), revealed Resident #1 was able to follow commands and cooperate. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Oct 21, 2021

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and services to prevent the development of new stage II, facility acquired pressure ulcers for two Residents (#52 & #45) of three residents reviewed for pressure injuries. This deficient practice resulted in harm to Resident #52 with the development two new stage II facility acquired pressure ulcers, the potential for further skin breakdown and deterioration of condition. Findings include: Resident #52 Review of Resident #52's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/23/21, revealed Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]

Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 125 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 15, 2026Standard8 findings
  • Nov 7, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jan 16, 2025Standard5 findings
  • Sep 26, 2024Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 11, 2024Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 7, 2024Standard5 findings
  • Jan 12, 2023Standard8 findings
  • Jun 14, 2022Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
Show the 28 earlier surveys
  • Oct 21, 2021Standard and complaint8 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 9, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 20, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jan 30, 2020Standard4 findings
  • Dec 26, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 22, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 14, 2019Standard12 findings
  • Mar 2, 2018Standard10 findings
  • Dec 26, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 24, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 12, 2017Standard5 findings
  • Jul 11, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 13, 2016Standard9 findings
  • Dec 1, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 23, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 3, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 26, 2014Standard4 findings
  • Oct 30, 2013—1 finding
  • Jan 10, 2013—6 findings
  • Oct 31, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Sep 19, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
  • May 2, 2012—1 finding
  • Jan 19, 2012—7 findings
  • Jan 6, 2012—2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 6, 2011—2 findings
  • Nov 4, 2010—2 findings
  • Oct 4, 2010—2 findings
  • Sep 9, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction