Deficiency Index

Meadows on Fairview

Wyoming, Minnesota · CCN 245622

7 surveys since 2016, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
15
Surveys
7
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2016–2025
’16’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file5/7

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
14
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
EBENEZER SENIOR LIVING
County
Chisago
Medicare-certified since
2014

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
5
Staffing
1
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Apr 16, 2025

572 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Annual nurse turnover56.3%42.1%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD266.7%E—F133.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 3 of the 15 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Meadows on Fairview, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Apr 16, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure tracking and surveillance was initiated and transmission-based precautions (TBP) implemented for 1 of 1 residents (R70) who was tested for clostridioides difficile, a highly contagious infection (C. Diff). The facility also failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was performed for 1 of 1 residents (R70) who was assisted with personal cares. Findings include: R70's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R70 was cognitively intact and had diagnoses of a femur fracture and heart failure. Furthermore, R70 required assistance of staff for toileting and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. R70's provider order dated 4/14/25 at 7:00 a.m., instructed staff to send a stool sample for C. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Apr 16, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a non-pressure wound was comprehensively assessed for 1 of 2 (R12) residents reviewed for non-pressure skin concerns. Findings include: R12's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R12 had cognitive impairment and diagnoses of diabetes. Furthermore, R12 had a diabetic foot ulcer. R12's provider and nursing orders dated 3/10/25, directed staff to change R70's wound vac (device that provides negative pressure to wound to promote healing) on Mondays and Thursdays. R12's care plan dated 3/18/25, indicated R12 was at risk for pressure injuries due to presence of wound vac, neuropathy and diabetes with diabetic foot ulcer. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF623Jul 24, 2024

    Based on document review and interview the facility failed to ensure a written notification of transfer was sent to the office of the Ombudsman for long term care for 2 of 2 residents (R1, R13) with the potential to affect all residents transferred to the hospital. Findings include: R1's face sheet dated 7/24/24 listed the following diagnoses: chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (long term breathing issues with low blood oxygen), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (long term narrowing of the breathing passages), diabetes, obesity, congestive heart failure (the heart was unable to pump efficiently), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), atrial fibrillation (top two chamber of the heart beat erratically), coronary artery disease (narrowing of the veins/arteries in the heart),… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF660Sep 14, 2021

    Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure a safe discharge transfer to a home care agency for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge. The facility did not communicate with the home health agency leaving the resident with a safety risk. The following day after the resident had been transferred home, a family member needed to assist resident with her catheter cares. The family called the home care agency that was on the discharge orders, and they were informed the home care agency had declined the resident. The resident was left without services. The resident was readmitted that same day back to the transitional care unit. […]

Read all 15 findings in full →

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 16, 2025Standard2 findings
  • Jul 24, 2024Standard1 finding
  • Sep 14, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 25, 2019Standard1 finding
  • May 31, 2018Standard1 finding
  • Apr 5, 2017Standard8 findings
  • Feb 24, 2016Standard1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction