Langton Shores
Roseville, Minnesota · CCN 245389
13 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 34
- Surveys
- 13
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 50
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- PRESBYTERIAN HOMES & SERVICES
- County
- Ramsey
- Medicare-certified since
- 1986
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=2, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Nov 21, 2024
718 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.87 | 4.22 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.42 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 33.3% | 42.1% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2100.0% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Langton Shores, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF883Nov 21, 2024
Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 residents (R1) was offered, educated and/or provided the pneumococcal vaccination series as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), who were reviewed for immunizations. Findings include: A CDC Adult Immunization Schedule by age topic, dated 11/21/2024, identified various tables when each (or all) of the pneumococcal vaccinations should be obtained. This identified when an adult over [AGE] years old had received the complete series (i.e., PPSV23 and PCV13; see below) then the patient and provider may choose to administer Pneumococcal 20-valent Conjugate Vaccine (PCV20) for patients who had received Pneumococcal 13-valent Conjugate Vaccine (PCV13) at any age and Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine 23… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880May 23, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP)-(an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities.) were implemented for management of a surgical wound to reduce the risk of infection to others for 1 of 1 resident (R2) reviewed for transfers. Findings include: R2's face sheet identified diagnoses of age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture of left lower leg and need of assistance with personal cares. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 34 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Nov 21, 2024Standard1 finding
- May 23, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Mar 5, 2020Standard1 finding
- Apr 30, 2019Standard6 findings
- Jun 14, 2018Standard5 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 6, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Oct 3, 2017Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 25, 2016Standard5 findings
Show the 5 earlier surveys
- Jul 10, 2014Standard4 findings
- Sep 12, 2013—1 finding
- Jun 28, 2012—5 findings
- Mar 6, 2012—2 findings
- May 5, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction