Deficiency Index

Meadowbrook at Chetek

Chetek, Wisconsin · CCN 525672

23 surveys since 2011, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
115
Surveys
23
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse4

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file15/23

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
97
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
SYNERGY SENIOR CARE
County
Barron · rural
Medicare-certified since
2004

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
3
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 51 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Wisconsin.

Last survey on record

Jul 16, 2026

116 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.823.71
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.13—
Annual nurse turnover50.7%44.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG12.9%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2779.4%E38.8%F38.8%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 34 of the 115 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6843×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Meadowbrook at Chetek, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF760Feb 3, 2026

    Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure that a system is in place to ensure that residents are free of any significant medication error for 6 of 9 residents (R) (R1, R3, R5, R7, R8, and R9) reviewed for medication errors.R1 is cited at a scope and severity level of G (actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy/isolated). R1 was administered R2's medications, which required R1 to receive Narcan and hospitalization. R3 was administered incorrect pain medication.R5 was administered medication that was discontinued and wrong dosage form.Pharmacy found that R7 had the wrong dose in the medical record for R7's Tacrolimus.R8 received a different resident's 40 mg tab of Atorvastatin. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880May 21, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive infection prevention and control program was established and maintained. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff used Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), sanitize mechanical lifts between resident use, complete proper hand hygiene, or provide residents with hand-hygiene before meals.-Registered Nurse (RN) C and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) D entered R23's room and conducted wound care on R23's open leg wounds without donning PPE prior to and during wound care treatment, having the ability to potentially spread infection to all 75 residents in the facility.-Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) R and LPN D did not wear PPE while transferring R4… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF851Mar 19, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure accurate reporting of the mandatory submission of staffing information based on payroll data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The facility failed to enter accurate data in their Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) system which triggered that they have excessively low weekend staffing. This has the potential to affect all 71 residents residing in the facility. This is evidenced by: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Electronic Staffing Data Submission Payroll-Based Journal, Long-term Care Facility Policy Manual, dated June 2022, states in part: Chapter 1: Overview, 1.1 introduction .(U) mandatory submission of staffing information based on payroll data in a uniform format. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Feb 26, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not prepare, distribute, and serve food in a manner that prevents foodborne illness for 57 of 59 residents reviewed. Findings include: Facility policy titled Storage, Prepare, Distribute, and Serve Food, last revised [DATE], stated in part, .-#3. Storage (Refrigerated) c. All refrigerated and prepared food must be covered, labeled, and dated with use-by date . Facility policy titled Labeling Food and Date Marking, last revised February 2020, stated in part, .-#2. Recommended that all items placed in refrigeration units be labeled with the name of the item, the date the item is placed in the refrigerator and/or the date it is to be used .-#6. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Mar 29, 2023

    Based on observations, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to properly prevent COVID-19 and other infectious diseases. This practice had the potential to affect all 60 residents residing in the facility. The facility did not implement infection control processes to prevent a COVID-19 outbreak. Signs posted at the entrance of the facility for visitors had incorrect COVID-19 Community Transmission data to base source control for visitors. Visitors were allowed throughout facility without proper source control when the county was in a high transmission rate and during a COVID-19 outbreak. […]

Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 115 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 16, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • May 21, 2026Standard10 findings
  • Feb 3, 2026Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 19, 2025Standard7 findings
  • Feb 26, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 29, 2024Complaint4 findings
  • Apr 24, 2024Standard5 findings
  • Mar 20, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 15 earlier surveys
  • Mar 29, 2023Standard7 findings
  • Jan 10, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 2, 2022Standard3 findings
  • Sep 1, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 20, 2020Standard3 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 17, 2019Standard4 findings
  • Jul 25, 2018Complaint3 findings
  • Oct 19, 2017Standard9 findings
  • Oct 27, 2016Standard and complaint13 findings
  • Sep 21, 2015Standard8 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 28, 2014Standard8 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 12, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 24, 2013—7 findings
  • Sep 27, 2012—7 findings
  • Jul 20, 2011—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction