Deficiency Index

Mcauley Hall Health Care Cente

Watchung, New Jersey · CCN 315337

10 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
46
Surveys
10
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file8/10

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
74
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Somerset
Medicare-certified since
1994

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 23 facilities of 66–99 beds in New Jersey.

Last survey on record

Aug 12, 2025

454 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.144.13
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.60—
Annual nurse turnover27.5%35.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD945.0%E525.0%F210.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C420.0%
CMS’s current file: 20 of the 46 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Mcauley Hall Health Care Cente, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 12, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) store potentially hazardous foods in a manner to prevent food borne illness and, b.) failed to maintain the kitchen environment and equipment in a sanitary manner to prevent contamination from foreign substances and potential for the development a food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 8/5/25 at 11:00 AM, in the presence of the Food Services Director (FSD), the surveyor observed the following:1. In the food preparation area, the surveyor observed a handwashing sink, which was attached to a stainless-steel food preparation area and there was no partition between the sink and food preparation surface.2. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF868Mar 13, 2024

    Based on the interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Infection Preventionist (IP), Director of Nursing (DON), Medical Director (MD), or designee attended the quarterly Quality Assurance (QA) meetings. This was identified for three (3) of the three (3) quarterly QA meetings reviewed. This failure had the potential to affect all 68 residents who currently live in the facility. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed the QA meeting sign-in sheets for the last three (3) quarters dated June 30,2023, September 30, 2023, and January 12, 2024. The sign-in sheets for those three (3) quarters revealed no DON signatures to show that the DON was in attendance for June 30, 2023, and January 12, 2024, QA meetings. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF686Mar 13, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) maintain infection control practices to reduce the risk of infection during a pressure ulcer (PU) treatment; b.) follow a physicians order during a PU treatment; c.) follow the recommendations of the wound care center physician; and d.) assess and document the measurements of the PU one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for PU (Resident #39). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 3/06/24 at 11:13 AM, the surveyor observed that Resident #39's door had a stop sign that indicated the resident was on enhanced barrier precautions. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF755Mar 13, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) maintain a system of record keeping of DEA (Drug Enforcement Administration) Form-222 (a federal narcotic requisition form used for ordering controlled substances), that ensured drug records were in order, and controlled dangerous substance (narcotics medications), with high potential for abuse were tracked with detail to enable prompt identification of loss or potential diversion of controlled substance; and b.) develop a policy and procedure for narcotic medications which included record keeping of DEA Form-222. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF921Mar 13, 2024

    Complaint# NJ154270 Based on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain: a) the residents' patio in a safe and homelike condition for one (1) of two (2) patios, b) the laundry area in a safe and sanitary condition, and c) a safe and sanitary environment in one (1) of three (3) kitchenettes in accordance with the facility procedures and federal regulations, and were identified during the environment tour of the facility. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 46 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 12, 2025Standard2 findings
  • Mar 13, 2024Standard and complaint18 findings
  • Nov 1, 2019Standard1 finding
  • Nov 16, 2018Standard5 findings
  • Sep 7, 2017Standard5 findings
  • Aug 30, 2016Standard5 findings
  • Aug 6, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Aug 21, 2014Standard5 findings
Show the 2 earlier surveys
  • Sep 12, 2013—1 finding
  • Sep 8, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction