Maverick Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Eagle Pass, Texas · CCN 676133
24 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 135
- Surveys
- 24
- Harm or worse
- 6
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 114
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- WELLSENTIAL HEALTH
- County
- Maverick
- Medicare-certified since
- 2007
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 34 not-for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Texas.
Last survey on record
Jun 27, 2026
135 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 2.93 | 3.21 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.34 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 47.1% | 44.7% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $15,642 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J12.9% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2777.1% | E617.1% | F12.9% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6953×
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5782×
Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
- F6442×
Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Maverick Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Sep 11, 2024
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #54) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #54 was properly secured in the facility transport van on 08/22/24 and sustained a fall resulting in fractures to the third and fourth left hand fingers and a fracture to the right elbow. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 08/22/204 and ended on 08/24/2024. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. Assessment of Resident #54. Inservice training to all staff related to Abuse and Neglect and Reporting Incidents to MD and RP. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF727Aug 11, 2023
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week, on 5 days during the look back period from April 1, 2023, to August 8, 2023 (99 calendar days). The facility failed to maintain RN coverage on: April 1,2023, April 2, 2023, April 5, 2023, May 12, 2023, and May 13, 2023. This failure could affect all 82 residents of the facility by placing them at risk for not having their nursing and medical needs met. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF804Dec 12, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food that is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 of 1 kitchen observed. 1. The facility failed to maintain the temperature for puree bread at 135 F or above. These failures could place residents at risk for weight loss, poor quality of life and food borne illness. The findings included:During an observation on 12/11/2025 at 11:45 a.m., the cook took the temperature of the bread puree on serving line which reached 116 degrees.During an interview on 12/11/2025 at 11:49 a.m., COOK G stated the holding temperature for hot items should be 145 degrees or above. [NAME] G stated they can reheat the item in the microwave if they do not meet holding temperatures. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Dec 12, 2025
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food storage safety. 1.The kitchen had an unsealed cheese bag dated 12/4/2025 in the fridge,2.The kitchen had an unsealed cilantro bag dated 12/5/2025 in the fridge.3.The kitchen had an unsealed pizza dough bag dated 10/26/2025 in the freezer.4.The kitchen had an undated macaroni container in the pantry5.The kitchen had a tomato that appeared to be spoiled in the fridge. This deficient practice could place residents who eat food from the kitchen at risk of foodborne illnesses.The findings include:During an observation on 12/09/2025 at 10:46 a.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Sep 11, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: The facility failed to ensure three packets of bread, observed in the freezer on 09/08/2024, were labeled and dated, and that one of packets was not opened in the freezer because the plastic bag was torn. This failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: Observation on 09/08/2024 at 9:59 a.m. in the kitchen revealed there was one freezer in the dry storage room, and inside the freezer there were three packets of bread. Two packets were covered in plastic bags but not labeled and dated. […]
Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 135 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 21, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jun 27, 2026Complaint9 findings
- Dec 12, 2025Standard8 findings
- Dec 4, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Sep 11, 2024Standard9 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 5, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Aug 11, 2023Standard6 findings
- Jun 4, 2023Complaint1 finding
Show the 16 earlier surveys
- Apr 27, 2023Complaint4 findings
- Mar 15, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jun 24, 2022Standard5 findings
- Apr 6, 2021Standard and complaint4 findings
- Dec 11, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jul 26, 2019Standard11 findings
- Aug 10, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Jun 29, 2018Standard and complaint7 findings
- Jul 13, 2017Standard1 finding
- Dec 20, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Nov 18, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Jul 1, 2016Standard22 findings · 5 harm
- Jul 31, 2015Standard12 findings
- Jun 28, 2013—15 findings
- Apr 27, 2012—9 findings
- May 13, 2011—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Southpark Meadows Nursing and Rehabilitation CenteAustin3 harm findings
- Conroe Health Care CenterConroe2 harm findings
- Edinburg Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterEdinburg2 harm findings
- Windflower Health CenterAmarillono harm findings
- Windsor Quail Valley Post-Acute HealthcareMissouri City4 harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction