Deficiency Index

Matthews Memorial Health Care Center

Alexandria, Louisiana · CCN 195600

37 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
122
Surveys
37
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file25/37

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
124
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
THE BEEBE FAMILY
County
Rapides
Medicare-certified since
2004

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
2
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 82 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Louisiana.

Last survey on record

Jul 8, 2026

124 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.783.57
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.21—
Annual nurse turnover59.2%45.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$36,140 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG12.5%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2870.0%E1127.5%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 40 of the 122 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6584×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F6774×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • F6864×

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

  • F6563×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F5802×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Matthews Memorial Health Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689May 2, 2024

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 1 Resident (#3) of 3 sampled Residents (#1, #2, and #3). The facility failed to ensure that Resident #3 was safely secured in a shower chair prior to showering. This deficient practice resulted in an actual harm for Resident #3 on 04/19/2024 at approximately 7:30 p.m., when Resident #3 was placed in a shower chair that was not equipped with a safety belt. Resident #3 fell from the shower chair to the floor, after being showered by S5 CNA. Resident #3 was transferred to the emergency room and diagnosed with a Displaced Left Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF558Apr 9, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received services and resources in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs by failing to:Ensure 1 (#2) of 5 residents reviewed had a call light in place that accommodated his/her needs; and Ensure a call light was within reach in order to call for assistance for 4 (R5, R6, R7, and R8) of 5 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/11/2020 with diagnoses that included, in part. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF658Sep 29, 2025

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure services were provided to meet professional standards of practice for 1 (#3 of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents and 1 (Resident #R1) of 1 random resident. The facility failed to:1. Ensure Resident #3's physician was notified of and immediately responded to the request of an antibiotic for a tooth abscess; and 2. Ensure Resident #R1's received wound care as ordered by the physician. Findings:Resident #3Review of the facility policy with a review/revision date of for Physician Orders read as. It is the policy of this community that all physician orders shall be implemented timely and carried out in a professional manner. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF684Sep 10, 2024

    38894 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 (Resident #27 and Resident #64) of 29 sampled residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings: Patient #27 Review of Resident #27's Electronic Health Record revealed an admitted [DATE] with the following diagnoses including Type 2 DM with Neuropathy and long term use of Insulin. Review of Resident #27's 09/2024 Physician Orders revealed the following including: 07/03/2024 - Insulin Glargine Soln Pen-Injector 100U/ml inject 15U q HS 07/03/2024 - HGBA1C q 3 months (Sept, Dec, Mar, June) 07/18/2024 - Accuchecks BID notify MD if CBG <60 or >300 Review of Resident #27's 09/2024 Electronic Medication Administration Record… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF697Sep 10, 2024

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 (#4, #64) of 2 residents reviewed for pain. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 and #64, who reported pain, received medication or interventions to alleviate pain. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Pain Screen and Management with a revision date of 12/2023 revealed in part . 1. All residents have the right to treatment for pain. 2. The resident's statements are the most valid measurement of pain. 3. […]

Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 122 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 8, 2026Complaint5 findings
  • Jun 3, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 9, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 11, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 4, 2025Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Sep 29, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 20, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 10, 2024Standard7 findings
Show the 29 earlier surveys
  • May 2, 2024Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 25, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 4, 2023Standard6 findings
  • Aug 7, 2023Complaint5 findings
  • Apr 20, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 8, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 5, 2022Standard8 findings
  • May 20, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 21, 2022Complaint3 findings
  • Feb 17, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 5, 2022Complaint4 findings
  • Oct 1, 2021Standard13 findings
  • Aug 19, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Jun 19, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 13, 2019Standard and complaint5 findings
  • Feb 7, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 4, 2018Standard1 finding
  • Apr 5, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 28, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 21, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 4, 2017Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
  • Nov 16, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Jan 16, 2014—5 findings
  • Feb 22, 2013—7 findings
  • Jun 7, 2012—2 findings
  • Mar 29, 2012—2 findings
  • Aug 12, 2011—1 finding
  • Apr 1, 2011—9 findings
  • Dec 9, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction