Deficiency Index

Martin Luther Care Center

Bloomington, Minnesota · CCN 245272

28 surveys since 2011, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
128
Surveys
28
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. 1 of these were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file18/28

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
137
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
EBENEZER SENIOR LIVING
County
Hennepin
Medicare-certified since
1985

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
2
Staffing
5
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 27 facilities with 128 or more beds in Minnesota.

Last survey on record

Jul 30, 2026

102 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.503.90
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.63—
Annual nurse turnover24.0%34.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$20,625 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ23.8%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3667.9%E815.1%F35.7%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B11.9%C35.7%
CMS’s current file: 53 of the 128 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6563×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6773×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • F6883×

    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.

  • F8103×

    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Martin Luther Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF578Jun 12, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure written Physician's Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (i.e., POLST) were accurately entered, transcribed and reflected in the medical record in a timely manner to help guarantee correct resuscitation measures (i.e., DNR or CPR) would be performed in accordance with resident wishes for 2 of 2 residents (R50, R321) reviewed for advanced directives. These findings constituted an immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation for R50 who would have received cardiopulmonary resuscitation measures (CPR) against her declared wishes. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF678Oct 24, 2024

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow 1 of 3 residents (R1's) Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) do not resuscitate, do not intubate, allow for natural death when R1 was found unconscious in his bed and registered nurse (RN)-A initiated CPR. This deficient practice had the potential to prolong R1's right for a natural death encumbered by potential complications of unnecessary life saving measures. The IJ began on [DATE] at 2:45 a.m. when RN-1 was found unresponsive in his room and RN-A initiated chest compressions. The IJ was identified on [DATE]. The Administrator and the Director of Nursing were notified on [DATE] at 5:00 p.m. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 18, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure expired and visibly molding produce was disposed to prevent serving expired food. This had potential to affect all residents, visitors and staff who consumed food from the main kitchen. Findings include: During the initial kitchen tour with the dietary director (DD) on [DATE] at 12:10 p.m., the walk-in cooler was observed, which stored food served to all units of the facility and contained the following expired foods; an unopened bag of broccoli with a use-by date of [DATE], which was noticeably watery with brown spots, four unopened five-pound bags of brussels sprouts with a use-by date of [DATE], a cardboard box with approximately 25 cucumbers with noticeable denting open areas and white colored mold, a… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Apr 18, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control measures were implemented for direct resident care for 1 of 1 residents (R230) who was placed on enhanced barrier precautions. In addition, the facility failed to ensure clean personal and facility laundry was protected during transport and storage outside resident rooms. This had the potential to affect all 132 residents who utilized facility provided laundry services. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 23, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 3 commercial food cooling devices (i.e., refrigerators, freezers) had ongoing monitoring of temperature and function to reduce the risk of potential foodborne illness; failed to ensure 1 of 2 commercial can openers was kept in a clean and sanitary manner; and failed to ensure dry goods removed from original packaging were stored in a manner to reduce the risk of cross-contamination. These findings had potential to affect all 123 residents, staff, and visitors, who consumed food prepared from the main production kitchen. […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 128 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 30, 2026Standard6 findings
  • Jun 12, 2025Standard and complaint15 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 2, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 24, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 7, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 22, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 21, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 18, 2024Standard and complaint12 findings
Show the 20 earlier surveys
  • Aug 2, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • May 18, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 23, 2023Standard13 findings
  • Dec 27, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 2, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 14, 2021Standard4 findings
  • Aug 19, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jun 23, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Apr 11, 2019Standard and complaint11 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 26, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 14, 2018Standard2 findings
  • Jun 21, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 2, 2017Standard13 findings
  • Jan 28, 2016Standard6 findings
  • Feb 26, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Nov 21, 2014Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Jan 17, 2014—11 findings
  • Feb 3, 2012—4 findings
  • May 20, 2011—9 findings
  • Mar 22, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction