Marquis Care at Shasta
Redding, California · CCN 056222
32 surveys since 2011, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 201
- Surveys
- 32
- Harm or worse
- 6
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 180
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- MARQUIS COMPANIES
- County
- Shasta
- Medicare-certified since
- 1970
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 225 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in California.
Last survey on record
Jun 24, 2026
138 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.58 | 4.08 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.40 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 52.8% | 37.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2955.8% | E1528.8% | F815.4% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6574×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
- F6003×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F8013×
Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
- F8043×
Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Marquis Care at Shasta, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Mar 5, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure federal regulations related to the education qualification requirements of the dietarymanager were followed as outlined in the California Code, Health and Safety Code (HSC1265.4). This failure had the potential to result in inadequate oversight of the food and nutrition services department associated with meal distribution accuracy, safe food handling and sanitation guidelines.Cross references to F812 examples #1, #2, #3 and #4 . Findings:On 03/02/2026 at 11:07 PM, an interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM). The DM stated he was responsible for managing the kitchen. DM stated that the Certified Dietary Manager credential expired 8/31/22. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF803Mar 5, 2026
Based on observation, interview and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the menus were followed when:1.The regular zucchini recipe was not followed.2.The puree zucchini recipe was not followed.3.The BBQ chicken recipe for regular diets was not followed.4.The puree BBQ chicken recipe was not followed.These failures had the potential to not meet the residents' nutritional needs for the 8 (Residents 8, 9, 35, 128, 22, 72, 91, 119) of 124 residents who received a pureed diet and 82 of 124 who received a regular diet. Findings:1. On 3/3/26 at 10:30 AM, a concurrent kitchen observation and interview was conducted during preparation of lunch meal with [NAME] 1 (CK 1). Steamed zucchini was in a hotel pan on the counter. It appeared without seasoning. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 5, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food safety and sanitation requirements were followed when:1. The kitchen environment was not cleaned adequately around stoves, ranges, and some refrigerators.2. Kitchen utensils and equipment were stored wet.3. Plastic cutting boards were found to be excessively scored & cut.4. Dry storage floors were found to be dirty. These failures posed the risk of foodborne illnesses in a highly susceptible resident population of 124 facility residents who received food prepared in the kitchen. Findings:1.During an observation of the kitchen on 3/2/26 at 11:07 am, grease and grime were observed on multiple surfaces of the main cooking area. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF803Oct 10, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the pureed food (food that is either ground, mashed or blended into a pudding like consistency), recipes were followed. This failure resulted in unappetizing food and had the potential for 11 residents who received pureed food, to receive diets that had not met their nutritional needs. Findings: A review of the facility Matrix (a record of residents and their needs), showed that 11 of 115 residents received pureed diets. A review of the facility's policy titled, Cooking Food dated 8/23/23, indicated, Recipes will be followed for the menu items. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF804Oct 10, 2024
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the facility food was appetizing and palatable when 14 of 115 residents (Residents 328, 329, 36, 576, 72, 26, 529, 86, 580, 119, 587 and three confidential residents), who received food prepared in the facility kitchen were not satisfied with the facility food. This failure had the potential for 14 residents to have decreased intake which could lead to unplanned weight loss and other medically related concerns. Findings: 1. […]
Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 201 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 26, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jun 24, 2026Complaint3 findings
- Mar 5, 2026Standard11 findings
- Sep 12, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Mar 3, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Nov 1, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Oct 10, 2024Standard16 findings
- May 16, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 24 earlier surveys
- Apr 3, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Aug 15, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jan 12, 2023Standard15 findings
- Nov 8, 2019Standard11 findings
- Oct 31, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Oct 29, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Nov 26, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Oct 11, 2018Standard and complaint14 findings
- Oct 12, 2017Standard12 findings
- Sep 1, 2016Standard14 findings
- May 20, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Apr 22, 2016Complaint3 findings
- Feb 19, 2016Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 13, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Oct 12, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Jun 4, 2015Standard24 findings · 3 harm
- Dec 16, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Apr 11, 2014Standard18 findings
- Mar 28, 2013—12 findings
- Jan 9, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
- Mar 1, 2012—1 finding
- Feb 9, 2012—15 findings
- Dec 27, 2011—2 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 17, 2011—12 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction