Deficiency Index

Marianwood Health and Rehabilitation

Issaquah, Washington · CCN 505418

35 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
232
Surveys
35
Harm or worse
11
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file29/35

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
117
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
THE ENSIGN GROUP
County
King
Medicare-certified since
1992

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
3
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 49 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Washington.

Last survey on record

Nov 21, 2025

353 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.813.98
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.96—
Annual nurse turnover66.1%47.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$64,574 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K12.0%L—
Actual harmG24.0%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3672.0%E918.0%F24.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 50 of the 232 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6573×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6583×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F5782×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

  • F6102×

    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

  • F6412×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Marianwood Health and Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF689Aug 1, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: (1) Ensure water temperatures were maintained to remain within the safe temperature of 110 (+/- 10) degrees Fahrenheit (F) as required for 13 of 13 rooms sampled for hot water temperatures (Rooms 328, 306, 330, 324, 114, 428, 202, 124, 408, 422, 102, 228, & 404); (2) ensure hazardous chemicals were kept locked and secured at all times for 2 of 4 nursing units (Unit A & C); and (3) identify potential risks associated with a resident's care needs and environment to decrease the risk of falling for 1 of 6 residents (Resident 64) reviewed for falls. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Feb 28, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from verbal abuse and mistreatment for 1 of 2 (Residents 1) residents reviewed for resident-to-resident incidents. Resident 1 experienced psychological harm when they had a change in their speaking pattern and tone, flat affect, crying, expressions of re-triggering of prior traumas, and feeling distressed after repeated verbal abuse by their roommate that escalated when not addressed timely by staff. This failed practice placed all residents at risk for the potential of verbal abuse, psychological harm, and diminished quality of life. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Apr 25, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident 8) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers (PUs) received the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, and prevent new ulcers from developing. Failure of the facility to assess skin integrity, follow Care Plan (CP) Interventions and initiate treatment orders caused harm to Resident 8 who developed an avoidable facility acquired right rib PU and a reopened a tailbone PU. Failure of the facility to complete skin assessments, prevent and treat PUs, placed Resident 8 and all other residents at risk for pressure ulcer development, increased risk for infection, and diminished quality of life. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF725Aug 1, 2024

    Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient qualified nursing staff were available to provide care and services for all facility residents including assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and timliness of call light response in accordance with established clinical standards, Care Plan (CP), and resident preferences. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident Council (RC)> Review of the 01/24/2024 RC meeting notes showed residents reported poor response times. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 1, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident meals were stored, prepared, and served in a sanitary manner for 1 of 1 kitchens and 1 of 4 unit pantries (Unit 400). These failures left residents at risk for spoiled or contaminated foods, and food-borne illness. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's 07/2024 Food Storage policy all food items would be labeled with with a manufacturer's expiration date or the date of receipt. The policy showed refrigerated foods would be discarded using either the manufacturer's expiration date or seven days after the written date. The policy showed all refrigerators used for nutrition would be cleaned weekly by dietary staff. […]

Read 29 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 29 of 232 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Nov 21, 2025Standard9 findings
  • Feb 28, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 25, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 1, 2024Standard25 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 12, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 25, 2023Standard12 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 16, 2021Standard37 findings
  • Jan 29, 2021Complaint1 finding
Show the 27 earlier surveys
  • Dec 11, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 3, 2020Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
  • Nov 16, 2020Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 28, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 2, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 19, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 28, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 29, 2020Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 18, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 16, 2019Standard20 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 16, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 16, 2017Standard16 findings
  • Jan 27, 2017Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 28, 2016Standard13 findings
  • May 25, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 31, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 3, 2016Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 29, 2015Complaint4 findings
  • Aug 25, 2015Complaint3 findings
  • Aug 3, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 2, 2015Standard20 findings
  • May 2, 2014Standard16 findings
  • Aug 13, 2013—2 findings
  • Mar 20, 2013—13 findings
  • Mar 1, 2012—6 findings
  • Jun 2, 2011—4 findings
  • May 31, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction