Deficiency Index

Avalon Care Center Federal Way, L.L.C.

Federal Way, Washington · CCN 505510

32 surveys since 2010, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
245
Surveys
32
Harm or worse
6
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse6

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file28/32

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
120
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
AVALON HEALTH CARE
County
King
Medicare-certified since
2002

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 49 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Washington.

Last survey on record

Nov 21, 2025

353 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.283.98
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.90—
Annual nurse turnover38.3%47.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3368.8%E1327.1%F24.2%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 48 of the 245 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6232×

    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.

  • F6252×

    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6582×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F6762×

    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Avalon Care Center Federal Way, L.L.C., in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Apr 19, 2021

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for Pressure Ulcers (PU) received care and services, in accordance with professional standards of practice, to promote healing of existing PUs and prevent the development of avoidable PUs. The facility failed to accurately assess the resident's clinical condition, identify factors that increased the risk for skin breakdown, ensure the development and implementation of a resident specific plan of care, provide ongoing assessment of existing PUs, and to ensure provision of care as ordered by a Physician. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF881Jul 24, 2024

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP), to promote appropriate use of Antibiotics (ABO), reduce the risk of unnecessary ABO use, and decrease the development of an ABO resistance for 6 of 6 sample residents (Resident 204, 80, 77, 64, 47, & 3) reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk for potential adverse outcomes associated with the inappropriate and/or unnecessary use of ABO's. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to a facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control ABO Stewardship, revised 03/2019, the program would validate that antibiotics were prescribed for the correct indication, the correct dose, the correct route and the correct duration. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF908Apr 28, 2023

    Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 out of 1 walk-in freezers was maintained in satisfactory working condition. The freezer temperature logs indicated the temperature was elevated for a month prior to the start of the survey and there was a leak in a pipe resulting in substantial ice buildup in the freezer. Although service visits were made a couple of weeks prior to the survey, the freezer continued to be out of temperature range and with significant ice buildup, without additional follow-up being implemented. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF886Oct 14, 2021

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure COVID-19, an infectious disease by a new virus causing respiratory illness with symptoms including cough, fever, new or worsening malaise, headache, or new dizziness, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, loss of taste or smell, and in severe cases difficulty breathing that could result in severe impairment or death, testing was documented as completed and/or the results of testing was documented in the residents' record for nine (39, 73, 45, 51, 22, 62 ,74, 87 and 91) of nine residents reviewed for documentation of COVID testing. Failure to add COVID testing results to individual health records left residents at risk for inaccurate health records. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF658Nov 21, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice for 5 (Residents 11, 82, 69, 13, & 7) of 25 residents reviewed. The nursing staff's failure to clarify and/or follow Physician Orders (PO) and follow medication parameters placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, risk for medication errors, delayed treatment, and potential negative outcomes. Findings included .<Facility Policy>Review of the facility's 12/01/2007 General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration policy, showed prior to administration of medication the facility staff would take all measures required each time a medication was administered; the correct medication, correct dose and correct rate was provided. […]

Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 245 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Nov 21, 2025Standard12 findings
  • Nov 5, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 24, 2024Standard24 findings
  • Apr 28, 2023Standard11 findings
  • Mar 16, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 3, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 9, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 14, 2021Standard and complaint42 findings
Show the 24 earlier surveys
  • Aug 26, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 16, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 19, 2021Complaint7 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 13, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 23, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 31, 2020Complaint5 findings · 2 harm
  • Feb 9, 2020Standard23 findings
  • Sep 5, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 25, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 6, 2018Standard16 findings
  • Oct 8, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 7, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 8, 2017Standard10 findings
  • May 18, 2016Standard10 findings
  • Oct 6, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 3, 2015Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 22, 2015Standard20 findings
  • Oct 29, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 23, 2014—11 findings
  • Nov 19, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Aug 17, 2012—9 findings
  • Sep 27, 2011—13 findings
  • Jul 26, 2011—1 finding
  • Jul 27, 2010—13 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction