Deficiency Index

Mansfield Nursing Center

Mansfield, Louisiana · CCN 195539

21 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
68
Surveys
21
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file16/21

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
100
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
RIGHTCARE HEALTH SERVICES
County
De Soto
Medicare-certified since
1990

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
3
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 82 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Louisiana.

Last survey on record

May 7, 2026

186 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.073.57
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.16—
Annual nurse turnover33.3%45.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD533.3%E1066.7%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 15 of the 68 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5582×

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5771×

    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.

  • F5801×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F6001×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Mansfield Nursing Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF558Aug 13, 2025

    Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to accommodate the needs of 1(#8) of 20 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure the resident was reassessed for the use assist rails.Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed Resident #8 was admitted [DATE], with a readmission date of 07/28/2025. Resident #8's diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left-non dominate side and lack of coordination. Review of Resident #8's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 06/08/2025 revealed Resident #8 had a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 13/15, indicating intact cognition. Resident #8 had limited range of motion for both upper and lower extremities on one side. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF628Aug 13, 2025

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to: provide to the resident and/or the resident's responsible party (RP) written notice which specified the reason for transfer, effective date, location and statement of the resident's appeal rights, and duration of the bed hold policy for 1 (#74) of 2 (#74, #76) residents reviewed for transfer/discharge, and notify the State's Long Term Care Ombudsman of discharges in writing for 2 (#74, #76) of 2 (#74, #76) residents reviewed for discharge requirements. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Aug 13, 2025

    Based on record review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were practiced to provide a safe, sanitary environment and help prevent the development and transmission of infection for 3 (#10, #13, #79) of 3 (#10, #13, #79) sampled residents requiring EBP (enhanced barrier precautions). The facility failed to:1. Post clear signage outside Resident #10, #13 and #79's room indicating the type of precautions, required personal protective equipment and high contact resident care activities that require the use of gown and gloves,2. Have gowns, gloves and alcohol-based hand rub available outside the room for Resident #10, #13 and #79 and 3. Obtain an order for EBP for Resident #79. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF600Mar 19, 2025

    Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from abuse of misappropriation of property and exploitation by staff for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents. S2 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) transferred money from Resident #1's bank account via [NAME] (bank to bank transfer) to her personal bank account. The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed prior to the State Agency's investigation entry on 03/17/2025, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance Citation. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF577Aug 14, 2024

    Based on observations and interview the facility failed to ensure the most recent survey results were posted in a place readily accessible to the residents, family members or anyone to review. Findings: Observation on 08/12/2024 at 10:00 a.m. failed to reveal the most recent survey results were posted in a place that was readily accessible for review. Observation on 08/12/2024 at 10:00 a.m. with S1 Administrator revealed the most recent survey results were not posted in a place that was readily available for review. During an interview on 08/12/2024 at 11:45 a.m. S1 Administrator confirmed the most recent survey results should have been posted for residents, family and anyone to review.

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 68 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 5, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • May 7, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 13, 2025Standard5 findings
  • Mar 19, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 14, 2024Standard4 findings
  • Sep 28, 2023Standard4 findings
  • Mar 21, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 14, 2022Standard4 findings
Show the 13 earlier surveys
  • Jul 7, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 14, 2021Standard2 findings
  • May 26, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 30, 2020Standard2 findings
  • Jan 17, 2019Standard6 findings
  • Feb 8, 2018Standard6 findings
  • Jan 14, 2016Standard5 findings
  • Jan 22, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Sep 19, 2013—2 findings
  • Jan 10, 2013—3 findings
  • May 3, 2012—1 finding
  • Feb 2, 2012—3 findings
  • Apr 14, 2011—12 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction