Deficiency Index

Madison Park Healthcare

Huntington, West Virginia · CCN 515021

16 surveys since 2009, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
116
Surveys
16
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2009–2026
’09’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file13/16

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
41
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Independent
County
Cabell
Medicare-certified since
1967

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 29 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in West Virginia.

Last survey on record

Jan 14, 2026

299 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.843.50
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.01—
Annual nurse turnover37.2%39.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1571.4%E628.6%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 21 of the 116 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8423×

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

  • F6842×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F7612×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Madison Park Healthcare, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jan 14, 2026

    Based on observation and staff interviews the facility to ensure the preparation of food items in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when not obtaining a hair restraint for his beard. This was a random opportunity of discovery. Facility Census: #40. Findings Include: a) [NAME] hair restraint On 01/12/26 at 11:15 AM it was observed Dietary [NAME] #14 standing over a skillet of beef cooking for the lunch meal. He had a beard and did not have a hair restraint in placed. In according to the current standards of practice such as the Food Code of the FDA, food service staff must wear hair restraints (e.g., hairnet, hat, and/or beard restraint) to prevent hair from contacting food. When ask if he was to have a hairnet in place over his beard he responded probably. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF622Aug 5, 2024

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete transfer forms to an acute care facility for Resident #4 and #30. This was true for two (2) of three (3) residents reviewed under the care area of hospitalization s. Resident identifiers: #4 and #30. Facility Census: 40. Findings included: a) Resident #4 On 08/06/24 at 1:30 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #4. The review found the resident had been transferred to an acute care facility on 07/23/24 for hyponatremia (low sodium). The review, also, found there was no transfer form completed for the transfer. On 08/06/24 at 2:00 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #18 was notified. LPN #18 confirmed the transfer form was not completed. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF623Aug 5, 2024

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman of resident transfers to an acute care setting. This failed practice was found true for (3) three of (3) three residents reviewed for hospitalization s during the Long Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers #38, #30 and #4. Facility Census 40. Findings included: a) Resident #38 A record review on 08/06/24 at 3:12 PM, revealed Resident #38 was transferred to the hospital on 07/22/24. Further record review revealed no notification was sent to the ombudsman for the acute transfer on 07/22/24. During an interview on 08/06/24 at 3:46 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse Unit Manager (LPNUM) confirmed the notification was not sent to the Ombudsman. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761Aug 5, 2024

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to record temperatures for the medication refrigerator on the third floor. This was a random opportunity for discovery and has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents currently residing in the facility. Facility Census: 40. Findings Include: a) Medication Refrigerator On 08/07/24 at 8:55 AM, a tour of the third floor medication room was completed. The tour found the medication refrigerator temperatures were not being checked twice daily. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Aug 5, 2024

    Based on policy review, observation and staff interview the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards of practice. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents currently residing in the facility. Facility Census: 40. Findings include: a) Reach-in refrigerator During the initial tour of the kitchen on 08/05/24 at 12:05 PM, the following items was found to be out of date or not labeled at all in the reach-in refrigerator: -- Broccoli soup with an expiration date of 08/01/24 -- Boiled eggs in a plastic container which was not labeled with a use by date. -- (2) two bowls of spiral cooked noodles which was not labeled with a use by date -- Tomato soup in a plastic container which was not labeled with a use by date. […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 116 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 14, 2026Standard3 findings
  • Aug 5, 2024Standard13 findings
  • Oct 5, 2022Standard5 findings
  • Jun 23, 2021Standard10 findings
  • Nov 3, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 11, 2019Standard7 findings
  • May 3, 2018Standard3 findings
  • Jun 7, 2017Complaint3 findings
Show the 8 earlier surveys
  • Apr 19, 2017Standard10 findings
  • Feb 12, 2016Standard20 findings · 2 harm
  • Apr 23, 2015Complaint12 findings
  • Jan 16, 2015Standard6 findings
  • Aug 22, 2013—3 findings
  • Mar 22, 2012—17 findings · 2 harm
  • Aug 19, 2011—1 finding
  • Aug 6, 2009—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction