Deficiency Index

Luverne Health and Rehabilitation, LLC

Luverne, Alabama · CCN 015336

11 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
31
Surveys
11
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2021
’11’15’20’21
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file8/11

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
151
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
NHS MANAGEMENT
County
Crenshaw · rural
Medicare-certified since
1973

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
3
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=2, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jul 29, 2021

1,929 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.643.81
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.41—
Annual nurse turnover51.8%47.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD562.5%E—F225.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C112.5%
CMS’s current file: 8 of the 31 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Luverne Health and Rehabilitation, LLC, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF677Jul 29, 2021

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of facility policies titled, Documentation of Routine ADL Care, and Hygiene and Grooming, the facility failed to ensure a resident did not have brown substance under three finger nails on the left hand. This affected Resident Identifier (RI) #76 one of one resident sampled for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's), and was observed on 7/27/21 and 7/28/21. Findings Include: A review of a facility policy titled Documentation of Routine ADL Care with an effective date of October 1, 2010 revealed . STANDARD: Activities of Daily Living are considered routine care services . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF693Jul 29, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy titled Tube Feeding -Bolus and through review of information contained in the Fundamentals of Nursing, Ninth Edition, Chapter 45, Nutrition, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #22's head of bed was elevated above 20 degrees while tube feeding was administered by feeding pump. This was observed on one of four residents on sample who received tube feeding by feeding pump. Findings Include: A review of facility policy titled Tube Feeding - Bolus with an effective date of May 1, 2018 revealed . PURPOSE: To provide liquid nourishment . through a tube into alimentary tract. PROCESS: . a. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 31 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 29, 2021Standard2 findings
  • Dec 19, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Jan 16, 2019Standard4 findings
  • Apr 19, 2018Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Mar 2, 2017Standard4 findings
  • Jan 28, 2016Standard5 findings
  • Dec 18, 2014Standard5 findings
  • Mar 12, 2014Standard2 findings
Show the 3 earlier surveys
  • Jan 30, 2013—1 finding
  • Jan 12, 2012—1 finding
  • Jan 27, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction