Deficiency Index

Woodland Village Rehabilitation and Healthcare Cen

Cullman, Alabama · CCN 015383

9 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
23
Surveys
9
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardy
4
The record, 2011–2021
’11’15’20’21
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy4

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file6/9

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
149
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
VENZA CARE MANAGEMENT
County
Cullman · rural
Medicare-certified since
1983

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
4
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=1, floor 20).

Last survey on record

May 6, 2021

2,013 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.103.81
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.51—
Annual nurse turnover38.2%47.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD266.7%E—F133.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 3 of the 23 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Woodland Village Rehabilitation and Healthcare Cen, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF803May 6, 2021

    Based on interviews, record review and review of a facility policy titled Select Menus, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #81's food preferences for his/her supper meals on 05/04/21 and 05/05/21 were honored. This affected RI #81, one of five sampled residents reviewed for food preferences. Findings Include: Review of a facility policy titled Select Menus, with an effective date of 11/28/16, revealed the following: . Policy Selective menus will be provided to all residents within allowed dietary restrictions . Procedure 1. Selective menus are provided to all residents to make their own menu selections . Responsibility The Dietary Director is responsible for the implementation and overall compliance of this policy and procedure. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 23 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 6, 2021Standard and complaint1 finding
  • Jun 26, 2019Standard1 finding
  • Jun 7, 2018Standard1 finding
  • Feb 25, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Mar 6, 2015Complaint4 findings · 4 harm
  • Jan 29, 2015Standard3 findings
  • Feb 27, 2014Standard4 findings
  • Dec 13, 2012—2 findings
Show the 1 earlier survey
  • Oct 20, 2011—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction