Deficiency Index

Luther Home

Marinette, Wisconsin · CCN 525476

31 surveys since 2010, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
132
Surveys
31
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
4
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy4

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file23/31

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
80
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Marinette · rural
Medicare-certified since
1991

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 20 not-for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Wisconsin.

Last survey on record

Jul 9, 2026

123 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.134.33
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.67—
Annual nurse turnover37.7%49.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2586.2%E310.3%F13.4%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 29 of the 132 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6104×

    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

  • F5802×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F6002×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6072×

    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.

  • F6092×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Luther Home, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF578Jul 5, 2022

    Based on resident and staff interview and medical record review, the facility did not ensure Resident (R) wishes regarding code status were clearly and accurately identified for 2 of 22 residents (R38 and R39) investigated for Advance Directives. R38 verbalized the desire to be a full code. R38's medical record was inconsistent, identifying R38 as both a full code and a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). Additionally, when R38 expressed a desire to be full code, the facility did not change the record until the next day. R39's medical record did not reflect R39's wishes to be DNR. Facility failure to clearly identify resident wishes for resuscitation created a finding of immediate jeopardy that began on [DATE]. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF695Mar 29, 2021

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility did not ensure that respiratory assessments were completed as ordered for 1 Resident (R) (R1) of 3 sampled residents. R1 had a nurse practitioner's order to conduct respiratory assessments two times per shift ordered on 3/16/21. Respiratory assessments were only completed two times per day following the 3/16/21 order. R1 developed symptoms of respiratory distress on 3/19/21 that required emergency transport to hospital with a subsequent diagnosis [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] Findings include: On 3/29/21, Surveyor reviewed R1's medical record. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . R1 was discharged to the hospital on 3/19/21 and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Sep 14, 2023

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent or contain the transmission of communicable diseases and infection, including COVID-19. This had the potential to affect all 63 residents residing in the facility. The facility did not ensure staff performed proper hand hygiene during the provision of cares for 4 Residents (R) (R7, R8, R11, and R13) of 4 residents. The facility did not ensure staff wore eye protection in rooms of residents who were on isolation precautions related to COVID-19. The facility did not ensure staff wore an N95 respirator in a resident's room who was on isolation precautions related to COVID-19. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 5, 2022

    Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure safe food handling practices were implemented. This had the potential to affect all 59 residents. Kitchen observations included: Food packages meant for resident consumption were found to be opened without open date or use-by date labels implemented. Food items meant for resident consumption were noted in the kitchen to be past use-by date(s). Food was removed from it's original containers without open/use-by dates or manufacturer expiration labels implemented. A fan was noted to be directed at the clean dish rack which contained dishes utilized to serve resident's food with a fire alarm device containing dust within the path of the fan's air flow. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 6, 2021

    Based on observation, staff interview and record review the facility did not store and prepare food under sanitary conditions according to professional standards of practice. This had to potential to impact all 74 residents residing at the facility. Grill was observed soiled with food residue. Work station above flour bins was observed with spilled pudding. Ovens under grill observed with burned food on bottom. Staff were observed not using appropriate hand hygiene during tray service. Cooler was observed to contain undated pan of sliced ham and undated container of meatballs. Findings include: Facility provided policy titled Hand Washing with a date of 2019 at bottom of document stated, Employees will wash hands as frequently as needed throughout the day using proper washing procedures . […]

Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 132 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 9, 2026Complaint4 findings
  • Jul 1, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 10, 2025Standard10 findings
  • Oct 30, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • Aug 21, 2024Standard4 findings
  • Jan 17, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 14, 2023Infection control2 findings
  • Jun 7, 2023Standard4 findings
Show the 23 earlier surveys
  • Jan 6, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 5, 2022Standard and complaint9 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 6, 2021Complaint5 findings
  • May 19, 2021Standard9 findings
  • Mar 29, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Sep 28, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 6, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 28, 2019Standard4 findings
  • May 20, 2019Complaint7 findings
  • Mar 28, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Dec 18, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 23, 2018Standard11 findings
  • May 30, 2018Complaint4 findings
  • May 10, 2017Standard7 findings
  • Mar 24, 2016Standard7 findings
  • Feb 9, 2015Standard7 findings
  • Jan 28, 2014—2 findings
  • Nov 1, 2012—5 findings
  • Nov 28, 2011—4 findings · 3 harm
  • Oct 7, 2011—1 finding
  • Sep 16, 2011—9 findings
  • Feb 3, 2011—1 finding
  • Jul 2, 2010—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction