Louisville Gardens Care Center
Louisville, Ohio · CCN 366141
35 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2020.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 157
- Surveys
- 35
- Harm or worse
- 6
- Immediate jeopardy
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 99
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- CCH HEALTHCARE
- County
- Stark
- Medicare-certified since
- 1997
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 391 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Ohio.
Last survey on record
Dec 11, 2025
333 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.82 | 3.47 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.40 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 79.4% | 49.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $115,891 across 1 penalty
- Payment denials
- 1
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L11.9% |
| Actual harm | G11.9% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2750.9% | E1018.9% | F1120.8% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C35.7% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6774×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F6864×
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6002×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F7252×
Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Louisville Gardens Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, widespreadF600Mar 11, 2024
Based on observation, record review, including review of the facility payroll records, review of facility billing/financial information, review of email communication, review of the employee handbook, review of the facility Abuse/Neglect policy and procedure and interviews, the facility neglected to meet financial obligations for the delivery of care and maintenance of the facility and to operate in a manner to ensure all bills were being paid timely to prevent potential interruption in services and to meet the total care needs of all residents admitted to and/or retained in the facility. The facility also failed to have an effective system in place to ensure staff were compensated via payroll benefits based on their hire agreement and payroll schedule. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF697Apr 27, 2021
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to medicate Resident #10 for complaints of pain during wound care. This resulted in harm to the resident when the resident reported complaints of pain during her wound care and was not medicated to alleviate the resident's pain during or following the wound care. This finding affected one (Resident #10) of two residents (#34) reviewed for pain. Findings include: Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Jan 11, 2021
Based on medical record review, staff interview and facility policy, the facility failed to identify resident skin impairment, failed to seek treatment options in a timely manner and failed to implement pressure relieving intervention for Resident #44, (who required total assistance with all activities of daily living) and failed to perform thorough weekly wound assessments on Resident #44 and Resident #6. This resulted in actual harm on 11/29/20 when a coccyx wound for Resident #44 declined to a Stage Four pressure ulcer and she developed deep tissue injuries to both of her heels. This affected two residents (Resident #45 and #6) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: 1. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF760Jan 11, 2021
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to prevent significant medication errors for Resident #44. Actual harm occurred on 06/03/20 when Resident #44 was administered the incorrect medications causing a change in her condition requiring medical testing/evaluation and additional medication changes. This affected one of three residents reviewed for medications errors. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. The resident was discharged home with family on 11/30/20. Review of the medication error report dated 06/03/20 at 7:40 A.M. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF725Sep 4, 2025
Based on observations, payroll-based journal review, facility assessment review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing to meet resident needs. This had the potential to affect all residents residing within the facility. The facility census was 53. Findings include: 1. Review of the Facility Assessment Tool updated 08/11/25 revealed the staffing included seven nurses per day; ten certified nursing assistants (CNAs) per day; two other nursing personnel; one dietitian, seven food and nutrition services staff, and one respiratory care services staff. […]
Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 157 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Dec 11, 2025Complaint4 findings
- Sep 4, 2025Standard and complaint10 findings
- Apr 16, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jan 28, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Mar 11, 2024Complaint7 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 9, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Nov 15, 2023Complaint5 findings
- Feb 16, 2023Standard12 findings
Show the 27 earlier surveys
- Dec 16, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Oct 24, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Sep 26, 2022Complaint8 findings
- Feb 8, 2022Complaint2 findings
- Dec 10, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Nov 15, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Sep 8, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Aug 5, 2021Complaint3 findings
- Jun 30, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Apr 27, 2021Standard14 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 24, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jan 11, 2021Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
- Feb 4, 2020Complaint11 findings · 2 harm
- Jan 10, 2019Standard5 findings
- Aug 9, 2018Complaint7 findings
- Dec 20, 2017Standard13 findings
- Sep 6, 2017Complaint6 findings
- Jun 21, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Apr 12, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Dec 12, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Sep 22, 2016Standard7 findings
- Dec 3, 2015Standard2 findings
- Aug 28, 2014Standard6 findings
- May 24, 2013—6 findings
- Mar 1, 2012—4 findings
- Jun 16, 2011—1 finding
- Jan 6, 2011—4 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction