Deficiency Index

Little Sisters of the Poor Sacred Heart Residence

Mobile, Alabama · CCN 015168

8 surveys since 2010, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
20
Surveys
8
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file5/8

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
75
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Mobile
Medicare-certified since
1977

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
5
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=1, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Nov 6, 2025

368 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.394.24
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.68—
Annual nurse turnover34.4%37.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD266.7%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C133.3%
CMS’s current file: 3 of the 20 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Little Sisters of the Poor Sacred Heart Residence, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Nov 6, 2025

    Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policies titled Mechanical Lift Policy, Accident/Incident Reports, Residents, and Care Plan, the facility failed to ensure staff followed safe transfer procedures using assistive devices to prevent accidents for Resident Identifier (RI) #2, one of three residents reviewed for accident hazards. Specifically, on 12/05/2024 staff failed to use two staff members while operating the mechanical lift in the morning, and later that same day, failed to use the mechanical lift at all, instead completing a two-person manual transfer. As a result, RI #2 sustained a 10-centimeter (cm) bruise to his/her left lower leg and reported a pain level of seven out of 10. […]

Read all 20 findings in full →

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Nov 6, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 24, 2019Standard1 finding
  • Dec 28, 2017Standard1 finding
  • Dec 3, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Oct 31, 2013—7 findings
  • Oct 12, 2012—3 findings
  • Dec 1, 2011—5 findings
  • Dec 23, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction