Clay County Nursing Home
Ashland, Alabama · CCN 015124
11 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 23
- Surveys
- 11
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 83
- Ownership
- Non profit - Other
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Clay · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1974
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 1
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=2, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Mar 16, 2022
1,699 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.73 | 4.24 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.64 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 39.7% | 37.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D450.0% | E225.0% | F112.5% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B112.5% | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Clay County Nursing Home, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF679Mar 16, 2022
Based on record review, observations, interviews, review of a Facility Assessment and Activity Calendars, and review of an Activities policy, the facility failed to provide adequate facility-sponsored group or individual/independent activities to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of Resident Identifier (RI) #65, one of two residents reviewed for activities in the secured Memory Care Unit (MCU). Findings included: A review of a policy titled Activities, last reviewed in June of 2021, revealed, . […]
- No harm, potential for minimal, patternF582Mar 16, 2022
Based on interviews, review of SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review forms, and review of a policy titled Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Coverage (SNFABN), the facility failed to provide SNFABN forms to Resident Identifier (RI) #36, RI #66, or RI #216, three of three residents reviewed for proper SNFABN. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Coverage (SNFABN), last reviewed in June of 2021, indicated the facility would . issue SNFABN to beneficiaries as required by CMS [Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services] . […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 23 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 16, 2022Standard2 findings
- Jul 23, 2020Infection control1 finding
- May 16, 2019Standard2 findings
- Jun 21, 2018Standard4 findings
- May 11, 2017Standard4 findings
- Jul 7, 2016Standard2 findings
- Jun 11, 2015Standard3 findings
- Jul 17, 2014Standard and complaint1 finding
Show the 3 earlier surveys
- Jun 13, 2013—1 finding
- Jun 8, 2012—1 finding
- May 5, 2011—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction