Deficiency Index

Little Neck Care Center

Little Neck, New York · CCN 335434

13 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2026.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
49
Surveys
13
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file8/13

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
120
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
OPTIMA CARE
County
Queens
Medicare-certified since
1976

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
1
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 79 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in New York.

Last survey on record

Jun 1, 2026

161 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.583.37
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.78—
Annual nurse turnover16.9%47.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$25,495 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ13.7%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2177.8%E13.7%F27.4%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C27.4%
CMS’s current file: 27 of the 49 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6092×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6552×

    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F7322×

    Post nurse staffing information every day.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Little Neck Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF610May 18, 2026

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during survey, the facility failed to ensure residents' safety after an allegation of abuse was made and the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of the alleged violation. This was evident for one of five residents (Resident #1) reviewed and sampled for risk of abuse. Specifically, on 05/02/2026 between 5:30 AM to 5:45 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant #1 reported to Licensed Practical Nurse #1 that in the presence of Certified Nursing Assistant #2, Resident #1 assaulted them during care. Licensed Practical Nurse #1 went to Resident #1's room and Resident #1 told Licensed Practical Nurse #1 they were beaten up. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF848Jun 1, 2026

    Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure the Binding Arbitration Agreement provides for the selection of a neutral arbitrator agreed upon by both parties and the agreement provides for the selection of a venue that is convenient to both parties. This was evident in three (3) (Residents #17, #57, and #117) of 28 total sampled residents. Specifically, the Binding Arbitration Agreement signed by Residents #17, #57, and #117 had no documented evidence the agreement addresses the selection of a neutral arbitrator agreed upon by both parties and the selection of a venue that is convenient to both parties.The findings are:There was no facility policy related to Binding Arbitration Agreement. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Oct 18, 2022

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from [DATE] to [DATE], the facility did not ensure safe food storage was practiced. This was evident during the kitchen observation. Specifically, expired liquid nutritional supplements, expired thickened juice and expired thickened water were observed in the kitchen's Emergency Food Storage Room (EMSR). The findings are: The facility policy titled Disaster/Plan for Food Service effective ,d+[DATE] documented the residents will be supplies with adequate and appropriate diets, adhering as close to the prescribed medical nutritional regimen as possible. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jun 1, 2026

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was evident during the kitchen and food service observations. Specifically, 19 vanilla puddings and 21 chocolate puddings in 4-ounce containers dated 05/22/2026 were stored in the kitchen refrigerator and ready to be served that were dated passed 72 hours from the time they were prepared. The findings include:The facility policy titled, Dating Food Items with a review date of 01/2026 documented all food prepared for daily use, example, all desserts, tuna salads, egg salads including cooked meats, and chicken, and fish are to be used within 72 hours (3 days) after date prepared. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF563May 26, 2021

    F563 Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during an Abbreviated survey (Complaint #NY 644) completed on 05/26/2021, the facility did not ensure that each resident has a right to receive visitors of the resident's choosing at the time of the resident's choosing. This was evident in three out of three residents sampled. Specifically, Residents #1, #2, and #3, are not allowed to have visitation in their rooms. Resident #1's family was unable to visit regularly due to the facility limitation on visitation. The finding included: Review of the facility policy titled, Visitation Policy dated 04/19/2021, documented that facility visitation will be outdoor, weather permitting. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 49 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 1, 2026Standard and complaint12 findings
  • May 18, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Aug 28, 2024Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Oct 18, 2022Standard and complaint11 findings
  • May 26, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 18, 2019Standard1 finding
  • Apr 5, 2018Standard1 finding
  • Jan 23, 2017Standard2 findings
Show the 5 earlier surveys
  • Dec 23, 2015Standard3 findings
  • Mar 4, 2014Standard1 finding
  • Jan 28, 2013—3 findings
  • Jan 23, 2012—4 findings
  • Dec 22, 2010—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction