Little Neck Care Center
Little Neck, New York · CCN 335434
13 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2026.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 49
- Surveys
- 13
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 120
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- OPTIMA CARE
- County
- Queens
- Medicare-certified since
- 1976
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 79 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in New York.
Last survey on record
Jun 1, 2026
161 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.58 | 3.37 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.78 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 16.9% | 47.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $25,495 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J13.7% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2177.8% | E13.7% | F27.4% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C27.4% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6092×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F6552×
Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F7322×
Post nurse staffing information every day.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Little Neck Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF610May 18, 2026
Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during survey, the facility failed to ensure residents' safety after an allegation of abuse was made and the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of the alleged violation. This was evident for one of five residents (Resident #1) reviewed and sampled for risk of abuse. Specifically, on 05/02/2026 between 5:30 AM to 5:45 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant #1 reported to Licensed Practical Nurse #1 that in the presence of Certified Nursing Assistant #2, Resident #1 assaulted them during care. Licensed Practical Nurse #1 went to Resident #1's room and Resident #1 told Licensed Practical Nurse #1 they were beaten up. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF848Jun 1, 2026
Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure the Binding Arbitration Agreement provides for the selection of a neutral arbitrator agreed upon by both parties and the agreement provides for the selection of a venue that is convenient to both parties. This was evident in three (3) (Residents #17, #57, and #117) of 28 total sampled residents. Specifically, the Binding Arbitration Agreement signed by Residents #17, #57, and #117 had no documented evidence the agreement addresses the selection of a neutral arbitrator agreed upon by both parties and the selection of a venue that is convenient to both parties.The findings are:There was no facility policy related to Binding Arbitration Agreement. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Oct 18, 2022
Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from [DATE] to [DATE], the facility did not ensure safe food storage was practiced. This was evident during the kitchen observation. Specifically, expired liquid nutritional supplements, expired thickened juice and expired thickened water were observed in the kitchen's Emergency Food Storage Room (EMSR). The findings are: The facility policy titled Disaster/Plan for Food Service effective ,d+[DATE] documented the residents will be supplies with adequate and appropriate diets, adhering as close to the prescribed medical nutritional regimen as possible. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jun 1, 2026
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was evident during the kitchen and food service observations. Specifically, 19 vanilla puddings and 21 chocolate puddings in 4-ounce containers dated 05/22/2026 were stored in the kitchen refrigerator and ready to be served that were dated passed 72 hours from the time they were prepared. The findings include:The facility policy titled, Dating Food Items with a review date of 01/2026 documented all food prepared for daily use, example, all desserts, tuna salads, egg salads including cooked meats, and chicken, and fish are to be used within 72 hours (3 days) after date prepared. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF563May 26, 2021
F563 Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during an Abbreviated survey (Complaint #NY 644) completed on 05/26/2021, the facility did not ensure that each resident has a right to receive visitors of the resident's choosing at the time of the resident's choosing. This was evident in three out of three residents sampled. Specifically, Residents #1, #2, and #3, are not allowed to have visitation in their rooms. Resident #1's family was unable to visit regularly due to the facility limitation on visitation. The finding included: Review of the facility policy titled, Visitation Policy dated 04/19/2021, documented that facility visitation will be outdoor, weather permitting. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 49 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 1, 2026Standard and complaint12 findings
- May 18, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 28, 2024Standard and complaint7 findings
- Oct 18, 2022Standard and complaint11 findings
- May 26, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Nov 18, 2019Standard1 finding
- Apr 5, 2018Standard1 finding
- Jan 23, 2017Standard2 findings
Show the 5 earlier surveys
- Dec 23, 2015Standard3 findings
- Mar 4, 2014Standard1 finding
- Jan 28, 2013—3 findings
- Jan 23, 2012—4 findings
- Dec 22, 2010—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Greene Meadows Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterCatskill1 harm finding
- Safire Rehabilitation of Southtowns, L L CBuffalono harm findings
- Betsy Ross Rehabilitation Center, IncRome2 harm findings
- Sans Souci Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterYonkersno harm findings
- The Pearl Nursing Center of RochesterRochesterno harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction