Deficiency Index

Lila Doyle Post Acute

Seneca, South Carolina · CCN 425075

11 surveys since 2010, 15 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
53
Surveys
11
Harm or worse
15
Immediate jeopardy
9
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy9

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file8/11

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
120
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
THE ENSIGN GROUP
County
Oconee · rural
Medicare-certified since
1971

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=8, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Feb 4, 2026

278 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.713.43
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.51—

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$18,106 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ112.5%K—L—
Actual harmG112.5%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD675.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 8 of the 53 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Lila Doyle Post Acute, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Nov 5, 2023

    Based on interviews, record review, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident (R)2) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for abuse was not sexually abused by a visitor of the facility. On 10/30/2023, a certified nursing assistant (CNA) witnessed a visitor fondle (stroke or caress lovingly, or erotically) the breast of a cognitively impaired resident, R2. Instead of immediately intervening to separate the resident from the visitor, the CNA left the resident alone in their room to report the incident to a nurse, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)6. LPN6 then removed the resident from their room but did not escort the visitor out of the facility, as listed in the facility's abuse policy. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 4, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to assess a resident to determine the level of supervision required while outside and ensure the environment was safe. On 11/22/2025, Resident (R)4, a resident with severe cognitive impairment, was taken outside by a staff member and left without direct supervision of staff. The staff failed to ensure the gate that enclosed the area was secured and the resident's wheelchair brakes were locked. R4 rolled down a hill, fell out of their wheelchair, and sustained an impacted left femoral neck fracture. The facility failed to ensure fall risk interventions were implemented for R2 and R8. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF610Nov 5, 2023

    Based on interviews, record review, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation following an allegation of sexual abuse for 1 resident (Resident #2) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Abuse: Prevention of and Prohibition Against, revised in October 2022, revealed, 4. All allegations of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation will be promptly and thoroughly investigated by the Administrator or his/her designee. The policy specified, 5. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF550Jul 13, 2023

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to promote the dignity of 1 (Resident (R) 6) of 1 resident who was observed with staff standing while assisting the resident to eat. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights: Respect and Dignity, dated 10/04/16, revealed . You have the right to be treated with respect and dignity . reside and receive services in the facility reasonable accommodation of your needs and preferences . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF656Jul 13, 2023

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the care plan for 1 (Resident (R)43) of 1 resident reviewed for skin conditions. Specifically, the failure to apply the skin protection devices placed R43 at risk for additional skin tears. Findings include: Review of R43's Medical Diagnosis, located in R43's electronic medical record (EMR) found in the Medical Diagnosis tab, revealed R43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but was not limited to; diabetes, heart failure, and pressure ulcer. Review of a Nursing Note dated 05/01/23 at 5:08 AM and located in the Progress Notes tab of R43's EMR, noted, . […]

Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 53 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Feb 4, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Nov 5, 2023Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 13, 2023Standard5 findings
  • Jan 11, 2019Standard and complaint10 findings · 5 harm
  • Nov 16, 2017Standard1 finding
  • Oct 20, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Jul 9, 2015Standard6 findings
  • Apr 9, 2014Standard10 findings · 5 harm
Show the 3 earlier surveys
  • Oct 11, 2012—3 findings
  • Nov 30, 2011—7 findings · 3 harm
  • Aug 18, 2010—5 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction