Deficiency Index

Carlyle Senior Care of Fork

Fork, South Carolina · CCN 425093

13 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2014.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
53
Surveys
13
Harm or worse
6
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse6

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file11/13

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
111
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
CARLYLE SENIOR CARE
County
Dillon · rural
Medicare-certified since
1972

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
4
Staffing
3
Quality measures
1

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=9, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Apr 18, 2025

570 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.563.43
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.34—
Annual nurse turnover34.6%44.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD675.0%E—F112.5%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C112.5%
CMS’s current file: 8 of the 53 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Carlyle Senior Care of Fork, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 23, 2023

    Based on observation, interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure foods that are stored in the walk-in refrigerator and freezer, and unit refrigerators were labeled and discarded after manufacturer's expiration date. These deficiencies had the potential to affect all the residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Dietary-Food Safety Requirements-Policy with an approval date of 05/21/19 revealed under policy explanation and compliance guidelines, (1) b. Storage of food in a manner that helps prevent deterioration or contamination of the food, including from growth of microorganisms; (3)c iv. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880Apr 18, 2025

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff served resident meals in a clean and safe manner and utilized proper hand hygiene during meal service in one (1) of two (2) dining rooms and for one (1) of one (1)1 resident observed during tray set up. (Resident (R)15) Findings include: During midday meal service on 4/15/25 from 12:10 p.m. to 12:55 p.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) HH was observed assisting multiple unidentified residents throughout the dining room with tray set up, getting additional drinks, getting and opening a resident's sandwich, clearing tables and removing trays. Additionally, CNA HH touched multiple residents on the arm, shoulder or back to prompt or encourage them to finish the meal. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF550Aug 23, 2023

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the dignity was maintained for 3 of 16 residents. Specifically, Resident (R)3, (R33) and R84 were observed in bed and wearing hospital gowns for multiple days. Findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled, Dignity - Promoting ad Maintaining, states under Policy, It is the practice of this facility to protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity as well as care for each resident in a manner and in an environment, the maintains or enhances resident's quality of life by recognizing each resident's individuality. Under the section titled Compliance Guidelines states, 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF584Aug 23, 2023

    Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure 2 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER]) on 2 of 4 units were in good repair. Findings include: A review of an undated facility policy titled, Maintenance Request Form revealed, Policy Statement: The Maintenance Director and maintenance staff shall respond to all maintenance requests in a prompt and efficient manner and keep a record of all work performed. The policy included, Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF636Aug 23, 2023

    Based on review of facility policy, record review, and interviews the facility failed to accurately assess Resident (R)45 after a fall for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, MDS-conducting an accurate resident assessment with an approval date of 09/25/19 revealed, the purpose of this policy is to assure that all resident's receive an accurate assessment, reflective of the resident's status at the time of the assessment, by staff qualified to assess relevant care areas. Review of the section titled policy explanation and compliance guidelines revealed, Qualified staff who are knowledgeable about the resident will conduct an accurate assessment addressing each resident's status, needs, strengths and areas of decline. […]

Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 53 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 18, 2025Standard1 finding
  • Aug 23, 2023Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Dec 6, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 15, 2019Standard3 findings
  • Aug 17, 2018Standard2 findings
  • Apr 20, 2017Standard9 findings
  • Jul 21, 2016Standard6 findings
  • Mar 20, 2015Standard and complaint8 findings · 1 harm
Show the 5 earlier surveys
  • Dec 11, 2014Complaint5 findings · 5 harm
  • Jul 10, 2013—5 findings
  • May 16, 2012—1 finding
  • Mar 23, 2011—4 findings
  • Dec 1, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction