Deficiency Index

Life Care Center of Port Saint Lucie

Port Saint Lucie, Florida · CCN 106012

27 surveys since 2011, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
121
Surveys
27
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file18/27

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
123
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA
County
St. Lucie
Medicare-certified since
1999

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
2
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 293 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Florida.

Last survey on record

Jan 29, 2026

284 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.993.57
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.70—
Annual nurse turnover37.6%44.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2987.9%E412.1%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 33 of the 121 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6845×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F5612×

    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.

  • F5842×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6092×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6922×

    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Life Care Center of Port Saint Lucie, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF880Jan 8, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, policy review, and manufacturer's instructions, the facility failed to follow manufacturer's instructions for disinfection of the glucometer (a device used to obtain a blood sugar level from a resident's blood sample) before use for 2 of 3 sampled residents observed. On 01/04/21 Staff B, a Registered Nurse (RN), used Clorox Clean-Up Disinfectant Cleaner with Bleach spray, which was a non-approved disinfectant as per the manufacturer's instructions for the glucometer as per the EPA number, for the blood glucose monitoring of Resident #55. On 01/05/21 Staff C, an RN, cleaned a glucometer with an alcohol wipe and then attempted to use the same glucometer that had not been disinfected to obtain a blood glucose level for Resident #19. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Aug 8, 2024

    Based on policy review, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in a dignified manner for 6 of 9 sampled residents reviewed with dignity concerns (Residents #26, #49, #54, #74, #3, #372). The findings included: Review of the policy Dignity reviewed 09/25/23 documented, Policy: Each resident has the right to be treated with dignity and respect. Interactions and activities with residents by staff, temporary agency staff, or volunteers must focus on maintaining and enhancing the resident's self-esteem, self-worth, and incorporating the resident's goals, preferences, and choices. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF584Aug 8, 2024

    Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable homelike environment 3 of 3 units (Unit 100, 200 and 400). The findings included: During observations on 08/05/24, 08/06/24 and 08/07/24, the following environmental concerns were noted in the facility: Rooms: 103-Observations made on 08/05/24 at 9:05 AM, the ceiling vent showed rust and dust. 104-Observations made on 08/06/24 at 10:43 AM, there was a stain on the wall under the window that appeared to be liquid splashed that was dripping down on the wall. 105-Observations made on 08/05/24 at 9:45 AM, the ceiling vent showed rust and dust; The floor was scuffed and paint peeling behind the bed. 106-Observations made on 08/05/24 at 9:23 AM, there was paint peeling from the wall behind bed. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF725Aug 8, 2024

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing to provide nursing and related services to meet the resident's needs and in a manner that promotes each resident's rights, physical, mental and psychosocial well being for 13 of 24 sampled residents. This failure was evidenced by verbal complaints of a lack of staff by Residents #57, #54, #12, #74, #18, #26, #29, #3, #49, #40, #34, #372, #366, or their family members. This was also evidence by the lack of dignified care for Residents #3, #26, #49, #54, #74, and #372. The findings included: 1) During interviews by the survey team on 08/05/24 and 08/06/24, the following concerns were voiced by residents and families. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF808Jun 8, 2023

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide mechanically altered food per physician's orders for 17 of 103 residents, including 3 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #12, #13 and #21). The findings included: The facility's policy for 'Mechanically Altered Diet', dated 03/15/22, documented, this diet can be used as a transition from the pureed textures to more solid textures. The Mechanically Altered Diet requires the resident to have the ability to chew and tolerate mixed textures. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 121 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 29, 2026Standard9 findings
  • Oct 15, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 11, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 1, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 20, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 4, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 8, 2024Standard11 findings
  • Dec 4, 2023Complaint2 findings
Show the 19 earlier surveys
  • Jun 8, 2023Standard5 findings
  • Oct 17, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 23, 2022Standard and complaint9 findings
  • Jan 8, 2021Standard and complaint8 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 11, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 14, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • May 9, 2019Standard13 findings
  • Aug 29, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 26, 2018Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Mar 23, 2017Standard5 findings
  • Feb 11, 2016Standard and complaint9 findings
  • Apr 21, 2015Complaint6 findings
  • Apr 7, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 20, 2014Standard11 findings
  • Feb 19, 2014—1 finding
  • Sep 12, 2013—6 findings
  • Aug 17, 2012—3 findings
  • Jul 1, 2011—3 findings · 1 harm
  • May 23, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction