Deficiency Index

Life Care Center of Port Orchard

Port Orchard, Washington · CCN 505210

37 surveys since 2011, 14 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
157
Surveys
37
Harm or worse
14
Immediate jeopardy
5
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy5

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file29/37

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
125
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA
County
Kitsap
Medicare-certified since
1979

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 49 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Washington.

Last survey on record

Jul 14, 2026

118 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.843.98
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.05—
Annual nurse turnover39.8%47.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3188.6%E411.4%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 35 of the 157 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6845×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6583×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F6412×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F6862×

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

  • F6952×

    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Life Care Center of Port Orchard, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF725Apr 10, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient qualified nursing staff were available to provide care and services as evidenced by information provided in Resident/Surveyor interviews for 11 residents (Resident 56, 4, 60, 40, 71, 2, 34, 7, 50, 36 & 97) interviewed, and 3 staff (Staff L, G & M) interviewed. The facility had insufficient staff to ensure residents received assistance with care in a timely manner without long wait times. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident InterviewsOn 04/06/2026 at 11:25 AM, Resident 56 said wait times for care was up to an hour on the morning and afternoon shifts. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF804Apr 10, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, attractive, and served at an appetizing temperature for 4 of 4 sampled Halls (Halls A, B, North 1 and North 2) reviewed for food . This failure placed residents at risk of weight loss, depressed mood, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Test TrayObservation of a test food tray on 04/10/2026 at 12:43 PM, showed a test tray with a white plate on a heated base system and had an insulated cover. The heated base system and white plate were both room temperature to the touch. Observation showed the white plate consisted of baked fish, coleslaw, corn and an Oreo dessert. Taste testing of corn showed it was mushy and overcooked. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF684Mar 26, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services adequate to prevent hospitalization for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 1 & 2) reviewed for hospitalization . The facility failed to provide and monitor for adequate hydration, recognize and intervene when decline occurred, and failed to notify physician and family of abnormal laboratory results. This failure placed residents at risk for dehydration, hospitalization , and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy, Hydration and Nutrition, revised [DATE], showed that each resident would receive sufficient fluids to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional and hydration status. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF758Dec 11, 2023

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive unnecessary medications for 3 of 5 sample Residents (25, 30, 62) reviewed for unnecessary medication use. The facility failure to attempt a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) of an antipsychotic medication or provide evidence a reduction had been attempted placed residents at risk for receiving an unneeded medication and potentially experiencing side effects related to the use of the medication. Findings included . 1) Resident 30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with agitation and major depressive disorder. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF582Feb 10, 2023

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide accurate Advanced Beneficiary Notices (ABN, a notification provided that listed services that Medicare would not pay for, along with the estimated costs of the services, so residents/beneficiaries could decide if they wished to continue receiving the services and assume financial responsibility) and/or obtain a choice in writing for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 4, 72 and 73) reviewed for Beneficiary Notification. The facility's failure to provide an accurate estimate of cost for continuing services placed residents at risk for not having adequate information to make informed financial and care decisions. […]

Read 34 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 34 of 157 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 27, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 14, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 2, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 10, 2026Standard15 findings
  • Mar 26, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 28, 2025Standard8 findings
  • Jun 18, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 23, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 29 earlier surveys
  • Dec 11, 2023Standard7 findings
  • Feb 10, 2023Standard21 findings
  • Jun 28, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 14, 2021Standard16 findings
  • Jun 29, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 13, 2020Complaint3 findings
  • Jan 30, 2019Standard15 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 20, 2017Standard5 findings
  • Dec 30, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 12, 2016Standard19 findings · 5 harm
  • Sep 21, 2016Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Jul 20, 2016Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • May 31, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • May 17, 2016Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 25, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 20, 2016Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 15, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 16, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Jun 25, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 5, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 17, 2014Standard3 findings
  • Jun 5, 2014Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 23, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 9, 2014—4 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 13, 2013—1 finding
  • Jan 16, 2013—2 findings
  • Aug 29, 2012—3 findings
  • Dec 12, 2011—1 finding
  • Jun 23, 2011—5 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction