Deficiency Index

Life Care Center of Orange Park

Orange Park, Florida · CCN 105928

16 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
50
Surveys
16
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file13/16

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
180
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA
County
Clay
Medicare-certified since
1996

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=8, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Feb 6, 2025

641 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.723.63
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.41—
Annual nurse turnover46.8%41.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD787.5%E112.5%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 8 of the 50 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6952×

    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

  • F5841×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6441×

    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.

  • F6571×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6771×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Life Care Center of Orange Park, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF584Jul 29, 2021

    Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to maintain a clean living environment for six (#42, #18, #5, #14, #33 and #91) of six residents receiving enteral feedings through a gastrostomy tube (g-tube), from a total of 36 sampled residents. Failure to provide a clean living environment can present the potential for infection and illness for the residents. The findings include: On 07/26/2021 at 2:56 PM, Resident #42's room was observed to have enteral food product splattered on the wall, intravenous (IV) pole and pump. (Photographic evidence obtained) On 07/27/2021 at 12:14 PM, Resident #18's room was observed to have enteral food product splattered on the pump, wall, floor and IV pole. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF644Feb 6, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review (PASRR) program under Medicaid, to the maximum extent practicable, to avoid duplicative testing and effort for two (Resident #40 and #80) of four residents whose PASRRs were reviewed, from a total survey sample of 41 residents. Resident #40's diagnoses were updated upon readmission indicating a need for a Level II, but no Level II was provided for review by the facility. Resident #80's Level I PASRR indicated that a Level II was required; however, no Level II was provided for review by the facility. The findings include: 1. A review of Resident #40's medical record revealed an admitted [DATE]. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF686Feb 6, 2025

    Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and a review of resident records, the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for one (Resident #144) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The findings include: On 2/03/2025 at 12:17 p.m., Resident #114 was seated in her wheelchair with both feet (red socks in place) dangling down towards the floor. A white gauze bandage was observed protruding from her sock around her right ankle area. When asked what happened, Resident #114 reported she had a sore from a tight shoe strap that cut into her skin a couple of months ago. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF695Feb 6, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents requiring respiratory care received such care, consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for one (Resident #226) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care, from a total of 21 residents receiving oxygen therapy, who was not receiving oxygen at the flow rate the physician ordered. The findings include: On 02/04/25 at 9:59 AM, Resident #226 was observed resting in bed with her eyes closed. She was wearing a nasal cannula attached to an oxygen concentrator and was receiving oxygen at a flow rate of 4 liters per minute (4L/min). (photographic evidence obtained) On 02/04/25 at 1:29 PM, Resident #226 was observed resting in her room. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF695Mar 23, 2023

    Based on observations, interviews, medical record review, and a review of the facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure residents who required respiratory care received care consistent with professional standards of practice and their comprehensive care plans, for two (Residents #87 and #76) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care, from a total of 36 residents in the sample. The findings include: 1. An observation of Resident #87 was made on 03/20/23 at 11:59 AM in her room. An oxygen concentrator was in the room and the flow rate (gauge) was set between the 1 and 2 measurement, indicating oxygen was flowing at a rate of 1.5 liters per minute (lpm). (Photographic evidence obtained) Resident #87's nasal cannula was lying on the bed. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 50 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Feb 6, 2025Standard3 findings
  • Mar 23, 2023Standard1 finding
  • Jul 29, 2021Standard4 findings
  • Aug 15, 2019Standard and complaint5 findings
  • Apr 19, 2018Standard7 findings
  • Aug 10, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 16, 2017Standard1 finding
  • Jan 28, 2016Standard5 findings
Show the 8 earlier surveys
  • Nov 6, 2014Standard3 findings
  • Oct 24, 2013—2 findings
  • Sep 13, 2012—3 findings
  • Aug 10, 2012—3 findings
  • Jul 2, 2012Complaint8 findings
  • Mar 14, 2012—1 finding
  • Jul 14, 2011—1 finding
  • May 27, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction