Deficiency Index

Life Care Center of Kona

Kailua Kona, Hawaii · CCN 125052

14 surveys since 2011, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
103
Surveys
14
Harm or worse
6
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse6

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file10/14

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
94
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA
County
Hawaii · rural
Medicare-certified since
2001

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
2
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 25 for-profit facilities in Hawaii.

Last survey on record

Jan 15, 2026

298 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.774.18
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.18—
Annual nurse turnover38.5%38.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$27,612 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG23.9%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3262.7%E713.7%F815.7%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C23.9%
CMS’s current file: 51 of the 103 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8124×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F6233×

    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.

  • F6563×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Life Care Center of Kona, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Sep 21, 2023

    Based on observations, record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for two Residents (R)8 and R36 sampled. As a result of these deficient practices 1) R8 fell and sustained a hematoma to the right side of her forehead and swelling of the right side of her face and 2) R36 was placed at risk for falling when being transported in a wheelchair that had no footrests. Findings include: (Cross Reference to F656: Develop/Implement Comprehensive Care Plan) 1) On 09/17/23 at 11:17 AM, observed R8 in her room sitting up in her wheelchair. R8 had a dressing on the right side of her forehead. When asked what happened to her head, R8 said I fell in the bathroom. Review of electronic health record (EHR) for R8 conducted. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF726Sep 21, 2023

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed ensure competent skills to assure resident safety and maintain the highest practicable well-being for two Residents (R)40 and R34 sampled. Nursing Staff (NS)99 delayed treatment by not immediately informing the physician after R40 fell from the bed sustaining redness and pain to touch (5/10) on the resident's left shoulder to ensure a physician evaluated the resident's overall condition(s), laboratory test, treatment of the resident was under the care of a physician. Approximately four to five hours after the fall, R40 had an acute mental status change and was transferred then discharged to an acute hospital for further treatment. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Feb 23, 2022

    Based on interviews and record review (RR), the facility failed to provide the needed care and services that were resident centered, in accordance with one resident's (R)1 preferences, goals for care and professional standards of practice. There was lack of documentation of R1's choices, preferences and goals to support not treating his critical medical condition related to his blood dyscrasias. Although this may not have been the sole contributing factor, R1 had four falls during [DATE] to [DATE] with progressive functional and cognitive decline that resulted in a transfer to the hospital where he was treated with blood [CONDITION(S)] and diagnosed with a subdural hemorrhage (bleeding in the brain) that required surgical intervention. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 23, 2022

    Based on record review (RR) and interviews the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to one resident (R)1 to prevent several falls in spite of the resident being a high fall risk related to his medical diagnosis. After R1 had a fall on 12/13/2020 he was on alert charting and frequent neurological checks to monitor his condition for signs/symptoms of any potential neurological decline. Although it was documented R1 showed increased signs of confusion, lethargy, and functional decline, the nursing staff did not monitor him appropriately. During that period of time R1 fell again. This deficient practice of the lack of monitoring and supervision resulted in harm from avoidable fall's and the eventual decline and death of R1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Jan 15, 2026

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility did not employ a qualified Director of Food and Nutrition Services (DFNS). A qualified DFNS must be a certified dietary manager, or a certified food service manager, or hold national certification for food service management and safety, or who holds an associate's degree or higher in food service management or hospitality. This deficient practice has the potential to compromise the health and nutritional status of all residents at the facility.Findings include:On 01/12/26 at 09:35 AM, an initial tour of the kitchen was done with Dietary Aide (DA) 2 and the Registered Dietician (RD). […]

Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 103 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 15, 2026Standard7 findings
  • Sep 25, 2024Standard and complaint14 findings
  • Sep 21, 2023Standard15 findings · 2 harm
  • Jun 9, 2022Standard and complaint15 findings
  • Feb 23, 2022Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
  • Jul 26, 2019Standard4 findings
  • Aug 31, 2018Standard and complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 9, 2017Standard6 findings
Show the 6 earlier surveys
  • Jun 3, 2016Standard7 findings
  • Aug 20, 2015Standard4 findings
  • Mar 25, 2014Standard7 findings
  • Feb 1, 2013—2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 4, 2012—2 findings
  • Jan 27, 2011—13 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction