Deficiency Index

Life Care Center of Banner Elk

Banner Elk, North Carolina · CCN 345203

11 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
32
Surveys
11
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file8/11

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
118
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA
County
Avery · rural
Medicare-certified since
1981

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
3
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=10, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Aug 6, 2025

460 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.183.47
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.41—
Annual nurse turnover17.6%49.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD685.7%E114.3%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 7 of the 32 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Life Care Center of Banner Elk, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF679Aug 21, 2024

    Based on record reviews, facility activity calendars, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure group activities were planned for outside of the facility to meet the needs of residents who expressed that it was important to them to attend group activities outside of the facility for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for activities (Resident #7, #22, #28, #21). The findings included: A review of the Resident Council Minutes from July 2023 through July 2024 revealed the following: -July 2023 the residents had discussed trips that might be fun when activities were able to provide group trips. Residents #22 and Resident #7 were in attendance. -September 2023 the residents had discussed wanting to take short trips on the Parkway to see the leaves change. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF690Aug 6, 2025

    Based on observations, record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to secure an indwelling urinary catheter tubing to prevent tension or trauma for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary catheter (Resident #62).The findings include:Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included benign prostatic hyperplasia with urinary obstruction.Review of Resident #62's physician orders dated 02/20/25 revealed an order to secure the catheter tubing with an anchoring device to prevent pulling or trauma.Review of Resident #62's care plan dated 02/20/25 addressed the use of an indwelling urinary catheter related to benign prostatic hyperplasia with obstruction. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF761Aug 6, 2025

    Based on observations, record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were under direct observation by the administering nurse who left medications unattended at the bedside of 1 of 1 resident reviewed for medication storage (Resident #56).Findings included:Resident #56 was admitted to the facility 05/05/23 with diagnoses including diabetes with polyneuropathy (damage of multiple nerves), hypertension (high blood pressure), and depression. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880Aug 6, 2025

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement their infection control policy when Nurse Aide (NA) #2 and the Treatment Nurse did not don (put on) a gown while providing wound care to Resident #47 who required enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) due to the presence of a pressure ulcer (sore). This deficient practice occurred for 2 of 7 staff members observed for infection control practices (Treatment Nurse and NA #2).Findings included:Review of the facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy last revised 03/21/2024 read in part as follows: Policy:The facility should use Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) as an additional MDRO [multi-drug resistant organisms] mitigation [prevention] strategy for residents that meet the following criteria,… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF565Aug 21, 2024

    Based on record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a resolution of Resident Council grievances for 1 of 1 monthly Resident Council Meetings (June 2024). The Resident Council had reported they would like to have transportation to go on group outings. The findings included: A review of the Grievance Program policy dated 5/6/2019 stated the facility should make prompt efforts to resolve a grievance and should actively work toward a solution of a complaint/grievance. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 32 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 6, 2025Standard3 findings
  • Aug 21, 2024Standard3 findings
  • May 24, 2023Standard1 finding
  • Aug 19, 2021Standard3 findings
  • May 2, 2019Standard1 finding
  • Apr 5, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 31, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 20, 2017Standard3 findings
Show the 3 earlier surveys
  • Dec 4, 2015Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Jul 27, 2012—3 findings
  • Jun 9, 2011—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction