Laurel Hill Nursing Center
Grants Pass, Oregon · CCN 385232
19 surveys since 2010, 8 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 105
- Surveys
- 19
- Harm or worse
- 8
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 44
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- REGENCY PACIFIC MANAGEMENT
- County
- Josephine
- Medicare-certified since
- 1992
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 32 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Oregon.
Last survey on record
Jan 28, 2026
285 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 5.14 | 5.00 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.94 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 60.0% | 48.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $23,465 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G26.9% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2172.4% | E310.3% | F310.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6843×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6862×
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5781×
Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Laurel Hill Nursing Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jul 24, 2026
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure bed brakes were engaged during resident care for fall prevention for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#8) reviewed for accidents. Resident 8 experienced a fall from bed and sustained a skin abrasion, increased lower extremity pain, and a decline in mobility status. Findings include:Resident 8 was admitted to the facility in 10/2024 with diagnoses including hemiparesis (one-sided weakness) following a stroke.An 11/18/25 Quarterly MDS Assessment for Resident 8 demonstrated a BIMS Score of 14, indicating intact cognitive function.An undated fall investigation document revealed Resident 8 suffered a fall to the floor between her/his bed and the wall which occurred while Staff 9 (CNA) was providing personal care and… […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Dec 15, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate supervision, follow care plans, complete thorough investigations and timely assess smoking for 4 of 4 sampled residents (#s 6,15, 23, and 134) reviewed for accidents. Resident 15 and Resident 134 experienced falls resulting in fractures. Findings include: 1. Resident 15 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease and stroke. A 7/13/22 Admission MDS and CAAs indicated Resident 15 was impaired on both sides, at risk for falls due to weakness, required increased ADL support and her/his care plan was to include interventions to reduce the risk of falls. a. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Sep 16, 2022
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a surgical wound was monitored and assessed for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#177) reviewed for non-pressure skin. This resulted in Resident 177's surgical wound becoming infected, and the resident being hospitalized . Findings include: The facility's 4/2018 Skin at Risk Program Overview indicated: 16. Skin conditions other than pressure ulcers, etc. will be documented on the resident's treatment record. Other skin conditions (rashes, skin tears, excoriations, abrasions, bruises or surgical wounds) would be addressed with appropriate treatment orders. 17. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 28, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to properly follow dish sanitation practices for 1 of 1 kitchen. This placed residents at risk for food borne illnesses. Findings include: Instructions for the facility dish machine revealed the dish machine required 50 parts per million of chlorine rinse to santize. On 3/27/25 at 12:40 PM Staff 26 was observed to use the dish machine to wash dishes. Staff 26 stated she started the dish machine in the mornings when she worked and ensured chemicals were visually flowing into the dish machine to verify the chemical concentration was adequate in the dish machine. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Dec 15, 2023
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to employ a director of food and nutrition services with the required certification for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for qualified dietary staff. This placed residents at risk for unmet dietary needs. Findings include: A 9/19/19 Nutrition and Food Service Training Program indicated Staff 4 (Dietary Manager) completed 270 contact hours of the program. On 12/12/23 at 11:05 AM Staff 4 indicated he did not yet pass the test for the nutrition program certification. On 12/13/23 at 1:35 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated she was only recently aware that Staff 4 did not possess the required certification as required.
Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 105 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 24, 2026Standard3 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 28, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Mar 28, 2025Standard and complaint10 findings
- Dec 15, 2023Standard and complaint10 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 16, 2022Standard and complaint8 findings · 1 harm
- May 3, 2022Complaint5 findings
- Feb 5, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Feb 14, 2020Standard and complaint12 findings · 1 harm
Show the 11 earlier surveys
- Oct 24, 2019Complaint3 findings
- May 15, 2018Standard13 findings
- Oct 31, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Jun 16, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Mar 24, 2017Standard5 findings
- Jan 19, 2016Standard11 findings · 3 harm
- Dec 4, 2014Standard5 findings
- Aug 13, 2014Complaint2 findings
- Apr 11, 2013—3 findings
- Feb 10, 2012—5 findings
- Nov 18, 2010—4 findings · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction