Latimer Nursing Home
Wilburton, Oklahoma · CCN 375535
21 surveys since 2011, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 131
- Surveys
- 21
- Harm or worse
- 4
- Immediate jeopardy
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 48
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Latimer · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 2009
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 1
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 50 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Oklahoma.
Last survey on record
May 13, 2025
545 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.44 | 3.80 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.32 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 58.6% | 53.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $83,622 across 14 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D838.1% | E1152.4% | F29.5% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F5782×
Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
- F6412×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F5841×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Latimer Nursing Home, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880May 3, 2024
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed develop, implement a policy and procedure for a water management program to prevent the growth of Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens in building water systems. The administrator identified 23 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: There was no policy and procedure for Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens in the building water system. On 05/03/24 at 10:16 a.m., the maintenance man stated the facility did not have a policy and procedure for Legionella at this time, but they were working on writing a policy and procedure for Legionella and other waterborne pathogens for the facility.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF578Mar 23, 2023
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed and provided written information concerning the right to accept or refuse to formulate an advance directive. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents, dated 03/21/23, documented a census of 27 residents. Findings: A review of the facility's policies failed to show implementation of a policy for advance directives. A review of records failed to show written advanced directive information had been provided to residents. On 03/22/23 at 4:00 p.m., the DON reported they were unaware of the requirement to inform and provide written information to residents regarding the right to accept or refuse to formulate an advance directive.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF584May 13, 2025
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide an environment free of urine odors for 1 of 2 halls. The Point of Care Rooms/Beds roster showed there were 14 residents residing on the South hall. Findings: On 05/05/25 at 12:30 p.m., there was a strong urine odor present on the South hall. On 05/06/25 at 7:50 a.m., there was a strong urine odor present on the South hall. On 05/07/25 at 7:55 a.m., there was a strong urine odor present on the south hall. On 05/07/25 at 4:07 p.m., LPN #3 stated in the morning the South hall smelled of urine. LPN #3 stated the odor got stronger when they opened the hopper room door. LPN #3 stated the strong urine smelled like the residents on the hall needed to drink more water. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF755May 13, 2025
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received their pain medication as ordered by the physician for 1 (#20) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for narcotic pain medication use. The MDS coordinator identified 15 residents received narcotic pain medications. Findings: Resident #20's quarterly assessment, dated 03/24/25, showed Resident #20 was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 and had diagnoses which included multiple sclerosis and chronic pain. Physicians orders, dated 03/26/25, showed Resident #20 was to receive: a. hydrocodone/acetaminophen (narcotic pain reliever) 10/325 mg, Give one tablet every six hours; b. cyclobenzaprine (muscle relaxant) 10 mg. Give one tablet in the morning, afternoon, and at bedtime; c. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880May 13, 2025
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to utilize EBP for 1 (#21) of 1 resident who was observed to receive catheter care. The Matrix for Providers identified three residents with urinary catheters. Findings: On 05/05/25 at 1:13 p.m., Resident #21 was observed in bed with a catheter bag hooked to the side of the bed. There was no sign to utilize enhanced barrier precautions nor was there enhanced barrier precaution equipment visible near the entrance to the resident's room or in the resident's room. On 05/08/25 at 2:50 p.m., CNA #4 was observed to drain the resident's urinary catheter. There was a towel, washcloth, and gloves lying on the floor near the foot of the resident's bed. […]
Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 131 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 13, 2025Standard and complaint5 findings
- May 3, 2024Standard13 findings
- Mar 23, 2023Standard3 findings
- Sep 26, 2019Standard7 findings
- Dec 4, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Jul 16, 2018Standard6 findings
- Sep 13, 2017Standard3 findings
- Oct 13, 2016Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
Show the 13 earlier surveys
- Jun 27, 2016Standard15 findings · 1 harm
- May 1, 2015Standard7 findings
- May 30, 2014Standard7 findings
- Jul 12, 2013—5 findings
- May 8, 2013—1 finding
- Mar 18, 2013Complaint9 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 3, 2012—1 finding
- Aug 24, 2012—2 findings
- Jun 7, 2012Standard and complaint13 findings
- Mar 16, 2012—7 findings
- Feb 1, 2012—3 findings
- Oct 5, 2011—1 finding
- Jul 15, 2011—19 findings · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction