Deficiency Index

Las Ventanas De Socorro

Socorro, Texas · CCN 676393

29 surveys since 2016, 7 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
118
Surveys
29
Harm or worse
7
Immediate jeopardy
6
The record, 2016–2026
’16’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy6

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file20/29

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
126
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
FUNDAMENTAL HEALTHCARE
County
El Paso
Medicare-certified since
2016

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
2
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 377 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Texas.

Last survey on record

May 15, 2026

178 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.633.25
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.88—
Annual nurse turnover47.8%54.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$8,827 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ12.1%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2144.7%E2553.2%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 47 of the 118 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8425×

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

  • F6564×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F8804×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6843×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Las Ventanas De Socorro, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Feb 23, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review facility failed to ensure residents were provided supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 1 of (Resident #1) of 10 residents reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had adequate supervision to prevent a choking episode on 02/06/24 when CNA F left her lunch bag unsupervised out in the hallway. Resident #1 grabbed a granola bar from CNA F and choked, resulting in loss of consciousness. This failure resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 02/23/24. The IJ template was provided to the Administrator and DON. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Apr 17, 2023

    Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure a resident received adequate supervision to prevent and accident for 1(Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for accidents in that: Resident #1 sustained a laceration on her head from a fall after being left unattended in the bathroom, causing her to be sent to the hopsital resulting in 7 stitches. This deficient practice could cause harm to fall risk residents if adequate supervision is not being implemented. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 04/17/2023 revealed an [AGE] year-old female that was admitted on [DATE]. Review of History and Physical dated 07/26/2022 revealed she had a history of falls due to a diagnosis of syncope (fainting due to low blood pressure or heart rate). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 26, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for dietary services. -Cook C did not take food temperatures before serving breakfast. -The Dietary Manager and Kitchen Aide D did not wear hairnets in the kitchen. -Foods in Dry Food Storage were opened, undated, and unsealed. -Dry Food Storage and Food prep areas had items with accumulation of dust, encrusted grease deposits, and other soiled accumulations. These failures could place residents who eat food prepared by facility at risk of food borne illnesses. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF641Feb 18, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the residents' status for 2 (Resident #70 and Resident #79) of 10 residents reviewed for assessment accuracy.The facility failed to accurately reflect Resident #70's ability to hear on his MDS.The facility to reflect Resident #79's surgical wound care and external Fixator on her MDS.This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving care specific to their condition.Findings includeRecord review of Resident #70's face sheet dated 2/18/2026 revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 11/5/2024.Record review of the Resident #70's History and Physical dated 11/07/2024 revealed the resident had diagnoses of cerebrovascular accident (blood flow interrupted to… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656Feb 18, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for two (Resident #26 and Resident #79) of 9 residents reviewed for care plans.The facility failed to include Resident #26's wound care for her right lower leg wound on her care plan.The facility failed to include Resident #79's wound care and external fixator on her care plan.These failures could affect residents requiring wound care by placing them at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs.The findings include:Record review of Resident #26's face sheet dated 02/16/2026… […]

Read 27 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 27 of 118 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 15, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 18, 2026Standard12 findings
  • Dec 4, 2025Complaint7 findings
  • May 19, 2025Complaint3 findings
  • Feb 24, 2025Complaint3 findings
  • Dec 4, 2024Standard5 findings
  • Feb 23, 2024Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 24, 2024Complaint3 findings
Show the 21 earlier surveys
  • Oct 22, 2023Standard and complaint11 findings
  • Apr 17, 2023Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 15, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 26, 2022Standard and complaint9 findings
  • Dec 29, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 25, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 17, 2021Standard1 finding
  • Sep 29, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 29, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 27, 2020Standard10 findings
  • Jan 9, 2020Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 2, 2019Standard6 findings · 1 harm
  • May 4, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 23, 2018Standard and complaint9 findings
  • Nov 16, 2017Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 23, 2017Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 28, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 13, 2017Standard and complaint13 findings
  • Dec 20, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 26, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jan 13, 2016Standard3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction