Deficiency Index

The Laurenwood Nursing and Rehabilitation

Duncanville, Texas · CCN 675806

31 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
80
Surveys
31
Harm or worse
7
Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
6
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy6

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file21/31

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
103
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
PARAMOUNT HEALTHCARE
County
Dallas
Medicare-certified since
1999

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 377 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Texas.

Last survey on record

Jun 24, 2026

138 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.203.25
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.30—
Annual nurse turnover55.6%54.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$38,522 across 3 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ313.0%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1252.2%E834.8%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 23 of the 80 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5832×

    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at The Laurenwood Nursing and Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, widespreadF880Nov 10, 2022

    Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment for one of one facility reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to identify the source and implement measures timely to respond to Legionella after a resident (Resident #1) was diagnosed on [DATE] with the disease while at the hospital. The facility completed testing of the water on [DATE] and received information on [DATE] that the facility had three areas positive for legionella. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on [DATE] at 4:35 pm. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jan 27, 2025

    Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one (Resident #1) resident of three residents reviewed for elopement. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was adequately supervised to prevent him from leaving the facility unsupervised on 01/13/2025. Resident #1 had unspecified dementia, other lack of coordination and wore a wander guard. Resident #1 eloped from the facility without anyone noticing him or hearing the wander guard alarm system go off. Resident #1 was located between the facility's white fence and the home next door approximately 10-15 feet from the facility's nearest exit door. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Dec 30, 2024

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure resident was free from abuse and neglect for 1(Resident # 2) of 10 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. 1. The facility failed to protect Resident # 2 from physical abuse by CNA F. Resident #2 was aggressively respositioned and hit twice in the face with an opened hand and closed fist by CNA F. Resident #2 grimaced after being hit twice in the face by CNA F. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, injury, and emotional distress. The noncompliance was identified at PNC. The noncompliance began on 5/15/2024 and ended on 5/15/2024. CNA F was arrested by law enforcement and terminated immediately. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Dec 30, 2024

    Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible and that residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one (Resident #1) resident of three residents reviewed for elopement. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was adequately supervised to prevent her from leaving the facility unsupervised. Resident #1 had severely cognitive impairment and lacked safety awareness. Resident #1 eloped from the facility rolling in her wheelchair across a four-lane busy residential street arriving at the fire station across the street 50 yards away. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF628Jun 4, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or resident's representative(s) of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand and send a copy of the notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #7, Resident #8, and Resident #77) reviewed for discharge planning. The facility failed to notify the residents or the residents' representative or POA of the transfer or discharge with the reasons for the move in writing in a language and manner they understand for Resident #7, Resident #8, and Resident #77.The facility failed to send a copy of the notice of transfer or discharge to the representative of the Office of the State LTC… […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 80 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 24, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 4, 2026Standard4 findings
  • Mar 16, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 9, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 2, 2025Standard and complaint5 findings
  • Jan 27, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 30, 2024Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
  • Apr 24, 2024Complaint3 findings
Show the 23 earlier surveys
  • Feb 22, 2024Standard1 finding
  • Sep 6, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 10, 2023Standard3 findings
  • Nov 16, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 10, 2022Infection control1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 16, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 6, 2021Standard4 findings
  • Jul 22, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 26, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 22, 2019Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Jun 10, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Oct 5, 2018Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Apr 24, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 14, 2017Standard3 findings
  • May 16, 2017Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Sep 16, 2016Standard1 finding
  • Sep 5, 2015Standard4 findings · 2 harm
  • Sep 4, 2014Standard5 findings
  • Sep 5, 2013—4 findings
  • Sep 14, 2012—3 findings
  • Jun 14, 2012—3 findings
  • Apr 2, 2012—1 finding
  • Sep 9, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction