Lakeside Generations Health Care Center
Dassel, Minnesota · CCN 245533
12 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 31
- Surveys
- 12
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 55
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- CASSIA
- County
- Meeker · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1989
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=12, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Feb 12, 2026
270 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.03 | 4.22 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.21 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 53.1% | 42.1% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G112.5% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D337.5% | E112.5% | F225.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C112.5% |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Lakeside Generations Health Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF760Feb 12, 2026
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to transcribe and administer a diuretic medication for 1 of 3 residents (R1) who had a diagnosis of heart failure that required medication management to prevent fluid related complications. The facility's failures resulted in actual harm for R1 when R1 was not administered 13 doses of Furosemide (diuretic) which contributed rapid weight gain, worsening respiratory status, and hospitalization for acute chronic congestive heart failure and hypoxia. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Dec 6, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to date frozen items when the original packaging was opened. Additionally, the facility failed to maintain food in the original packaging to assure the packaging date remained on food items. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 43 residents who ate food prepared from the kitchen. Findings include: During the initial kitchen tour on 12/02/24, at 1:15 p.m. , a tour was completed, accompanied by the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM)-A, and the Director of Food and Nutrition Services (DFN)-A. The following was noted: -One bag of precooked chicken, which measured approximately 12 inches by 14 inches, was not in the original packaging and lacked a date on the bag to indicate packaging date. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF851Feb 28, 2024
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to submit accurate and/or complete data for staffing information based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data during 1 of 1 quarter reviewed (Quarter 4), to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), according to specifications established by CMS. Findings include: Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) [NAME] Report 1705D for FY (Fiscal Year) Quarter 4 2023 (July 1-September 30) identified the Metric of Excessively Low Weekend Staffing triggered. Daily staff schedules for weekend hours staffed during the reporting period were reviewed and compared to the facility simple PB&J spreadsheet. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jan 12, 2023
Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to check the temperature of hot holding foods prior to serving to residents, provide for proper storage for opened food items, ensure foods were not expired, and ensure proper personal protective equipment was worn by kitchen staff. This had the potential to affect 44 of 46 residents. Further, the facility failed to have a system in place to monitor and record refrigerator/freezer temperatures for resident personal food items. This had the potential to affect 2 of 2 residents. Findings include: During an observation and interview on [DATE], at 4:47 p.m. dietary aide (DA)-A failed to check the temperature of the food prior to serving it from the steam table. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF757Feb 28, 2024
Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to identify diagnosis for use of medications for 4 of 6 residents (R4, R6, R16, and R34) reviewed for unnecessary medications and antibiotics. Findings include: R6's face sheet identified diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction (weakness and loss of movement following a stroke) on the left side, myocardial infarction (heart attack), diabetes mellitus type 2, hypertension (high blood pressure), hyperlipidemia (high fats in the blood), chronic pain, constipation, and muscle weakness. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 31 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 11, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Feb 12, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 6, 2024Standard and complaint4 findings
- Feb 28, 2024Standard3 findings
- Jan 12, 2023Standard and complaint2 findings
- Nov 7, 2019Standard and complaint4 findings
- Jan 31, 2019Standard2 findings
- Apr 26, 2018Standard5 findings · 1 harm
Show the 4 earlier surveys
- Feb 14, 2017Standard2 findings
- Feb 5, 2015Standard1 finding
- Dec 19, 2012—1 finding
- Oct 6, 2011—4 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction