Avera Sunrise Manor
Tyler, Minnesota · CCN 245357
15 surveys since 2010, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 46
- Surveys
- 15
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 30
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- AVERA HEALTH
- County
- Lincoln · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1986
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 1
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=16, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Apr 2, 2025
586 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.25 | 4.22 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.07 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 43.9% | 42.1% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1071.4% | E214.3% | F214.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Avera Sunrise Manor, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF727Apr 3, 2024
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) was on duty a minimum of 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days per week, for 2 of 168 days reviewed. This had the potential to affect all 29 resdients. Findings include: Review of the facility schedules from 10/1/23 through 3/17/24, identified there was no RN coverage on 12/10/23 and 3/3/24. Interview on 4/1/24 at 6:21 p.m., with the director of nursing (DON) identified she only has 1 full time RN at the facility other than herself and the case manager. At times the facility use the adjoining hospital's RN for coverage. The hospital RN was not physically present in the facility, and took call only. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 3, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure frozen raw meat and cooked meat were thawed in separate containers as not to cause potential cross contamination. In addition they failed to ensure test strips used for chemical sanitation were not expired. This had the potential to effect all residents residing in the facility. Observation on [DATE] at 10:44 am in the facility kitchen identified a packaged raw turkey and fully cooked turkey both sitting in a sink touching each other with a stream of water running over the raw turkey to thaw. Interview on [DATE] at 10:45, with (cook)-A identified this is a normal routine, after the frozen meat is partially thawed they place it in a container and it is moved to the refrigerator. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761Aug 3, 2023
Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure expired medication was removed from 2 of 2 medication carts and not administered to 6 of 6 residents (R4, R6, R21, R24, R26 and R27). Findings include: Observation and interview on 8/1/23 at 3:30 p.m., with registered nurse (RN)-A and RN-B during review of the two medication administration carts identified outdated medications had not been removed from the medication administration carts when the documented expiration dates had occurred and had resulted in expired medication being administered to residents. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF883Aug 3, 2023
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 5 of 5 residents (R11, R12, R15, R17, and R27) were appropriately vaccinated against pneumococcal disease upon admission and/or offer updated vaccination per Centers for Disease Control (CDC) vaccination recommendations. This had the ability to affect all 30 residents. Findings include: Review of the current CDC pneumococcal vaccine guidelines located at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/pneumo/hcp/pneumo-vaccine-timing.html, identified for: Adults [AGE] years of age or older, staff were to offer and/or provide based off previous vaccination status as shown below: a) If NO history of vaccination, offer and/or provide: aa) the PCV-20 OR bb) PCV-15 followed by PPSV-23 at least 1 year later. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF600Apr 2, 2025
Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to protect 1 of 1 resident (R8) from abuse. Findings include: Review of 3/29/25, report to the State Agency (SA) identified the DON was notified that an incident had occurred where NA-A had hit R8 in the stomach 3/27/25. The DON assessment of R8 was completed with no visible signs of injury to R8, no pain cues, and no change in behavior was noted. An investigation started. R8's 2/11/25, Significant Change, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment identified R8 had a severe cognitive deficit with continuous inattention and disorganized thinking. She had an altered level of consciousness and was dependent on staff for all her cares. R8 was on scheduled pain medication and had no indicators of pain displayed. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 46 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 2, 2025Standard and complaint4 findings
- Apr 3, 2024Standard3 findings
- Aug 3, 2023Standard7 findings
- May 6, 2022Standard and complaint1 finding
- Jul 21, 2021Complaint1 finding
- May 26, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Apr 9, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Aug 23, 2019Standard4 findings
Show the 7 earlier surveys
- Jun 6, 2018Standard6 findings
- Mar 23, 2017Standard4 findings
- Aug 4, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Oct 16, 2014Standard2 findings
- Dec 12, 2013—4 findings
- Mar 21, 2013—2 findings
- Dec 15, 2010—5 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction