Lakeland Village Nursing Facility
Medical Lake, Washington · CCN 50A263
52 surveys since 2011, 13 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 128
- Surveys
- 52
- Harm or worse
- 13
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 93
- Ownership
- Government - State
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Spokane
- Medicare-certified since
- 1994
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 59 facilities of 66–99 beds in Washington.
Last survey on record
May 4, 2026
189 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 11.12 | 4.80 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 2.17 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 32.6% | 32.6% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K13.8% | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2284.6% | E27.7% | F13.8% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6004×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F6094×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F6102×
Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
- F6842×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Lakeland Village Nursing Facility, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF812Sep 27, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to test modified fluid consistencies after preparation and before serving to vulnerableresidents at risk for aspiration (inhalation of food, liquid, or other material into the airway or lungs) in accordance with professional standards of practice and resident needs for 3 of 9 sampled residents (Residents 8, 30 and 43), reviewed for food and nutrition services. In addition, the facility failed to ensure that foods were stored and prepared in a safe manner, and dishwasher temperatures met the required standard which placed residents at risk for food borne illness and diminished quality of life for all 75 residents. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jun 18, 2021
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff used safe lifting techniques while transferring residents for one of three sample residents (1), reviewed for accidents. Failure to transfer Resident 1 as per the care plan resulted in actual harm, when the resident sustained bruising and swelling to the leg and perineal area, which required two emergency room (ER) visits for evaluation. Findings included Per the 03/17/2021 quarterly assessment, Resident 1 had diagnoses which included profound intellectual disability, was non-verbal, and communicated needs and pain through facial expressions, reaching out, and making noises. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Sep 27, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to review policies yearly as required, perform hand hygiene and/or glove changes when indicated, handle, store, and transport laundry in a manner to prevent the spread of infection. In addition, the facility failed to place signage in a conspicuous location outside the residents' room to clearly identify transmission based precautions implemented and appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) to be used, and implement enhanced barrier precautions to prevent the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 14), reviewed for infection control. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF802Sep 27, 2024
Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure all staff had food handler's cards (a certification that showed staff had completed training on food safety) to prepare food for facility residents. Specifically, in 6 of 7 cottages, the staff were occasionally preparing and cooking some foods, without food handler's cards. In addition, 1 of 24 dietary staff (C) had an expired food handler's card. This failed practice had the potential risk for unsafe food handling practices and placed all residents at risk for developing foodborne illness. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Mar 16, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure cleaning supplies were used per manufacturer recommendations in the 3-compartment sink in the main kitchen and on the main kitchen food preparation surfaces, and in 5 of 7 (Harvest, [NAME], Ponderosa, Tamarack and Shamrock) resident cottage kitchen areas inspected. This failure placed residents at risk for food-borne illnesses and potential contamination of food items. Findings included . 3-Compartment Sink Sanitizer The undated 3 Compartment Sink facility policy showed that a sink with at least three compartments must be provided for manually washing, rinsing, and sanitizing equipment and utensils. […]
Read 32 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 32 of 128 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 4, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Dec 15, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Oct 27, 2025Standard and complaint4 findings
- Jul 7, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Mar 14, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jan 23, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Sep 27, 2024Standard6 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 11, 2024Complaint2 findings
Show the 44 earlier surveys
- Jun 20, 2024Complaint3 findings
- Feb 22, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Apr 7, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Mar 16, 2023Standard and complaint4 findings
- Aug 26, 2022Complaint1 finding
- May 27, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Apr 26, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jun 18, 2021Infection control1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 14, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Dec 11, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Jan 10, 2020Standard8 findings
- Aug 9, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jul 17, 2019Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- May 9, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Mar 19, 2019Standard4 findings
- Jun 1, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Feb 23, 2018Standard12 findings
- Dec 12, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Jun 1, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Feb 1, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Jan 18, 2017Standard and complaint3 findings
- Sep 13, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Jun 30, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Jun 16, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Jan 14, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Dec 17, 2015Standard and complaint5 findings
- Nov 5, 2015Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 6, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Jun 23, 2015Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Apr 24, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Jan 22, 2015Standard and complaint21 findings
- Sep 9, 2014Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jul 17, 2014Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Apr 29, 2014Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- May 2, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
- Mar 29, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 31, 2013—4 findings
- Jan 3, 2013—1 finding
- Sep 5, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
- Mar 14, 2012—6 findings
- Jun 21, 2011—1 finding
- Jun 8, 2011—1 finding · 1 harm
- May 6, 2011—1 finding
- Jan 7, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction