Deficiency Index

Judson Park Health Center

Des Moines, Washington · CCN 505455

19 surveys since 2011, 10 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
194
Surveys
19
Harm or worse
10
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse10

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file16/19

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
96
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
HUMANGOOD
County
King
Medicare-certified since
1992

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
3
Staffing
5
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 59 facilities of 66–99 beds in Washington.

Last survey on record

Aug 28, 2025

438 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.604.80
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.04—
Annual nurse turnover21.1%32.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3866.7%E1628.1%F35.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 57 of the 194 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6413×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F6573×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5782×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Judson Park Health Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jan 12, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served in a sanitary manner and in accordance with professional standards of food safety. The failure to ensure food was stored appropriately, the dishwasher reached the required temperature necessary to sanitize dishes, ensure the clean area of the dishwashing area was free of food debris, hand hygiene was performed as required, and food preparation surfaces were free of contaminants left residents at risk of food contamination and food-borne illness. Findings included . Food Storage During initial rounds of the facility's main kitchen on 01/04/2023 at 9:00 AM open containers of dried parsley, poppy seeds and rice were observed in the dried food storage area. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jan 12, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement, monitor, and maintain their infection control practices providing a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the transmission of communicable disease. The failure to ensure staff performed hand hygiene when required, implemented correct Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) for a contagious infection for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 280) reviewed for TBP, ensured staff received education and proper fit testing for N95 respirators, used standard infection control practices during medication pass (Resident 14 and 288) placed residents, staff, and visitors at risk for development of contagious communicable infections and disease. Findings included . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF886Jan 12, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure their COVID-19 (a highly transmissible infectious virus that causes respiratory illness and in severe cases can cause difficulty breathing, pneumonia, hospitalization , and even death) staff testing procedures were conducted in a manner consistent with current standards of practice for COVID-19 testing, followed proper infection control guidance for safe testing, and was performed according to the Named brand COVID-19 Point-of-Care manufacturers recommendations to ensure accurate test results. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF578Aug 28, 2025

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to obtain and/or renew guardianship papers, and/or failed to provide assistance in the formulation of an Advanced Directive (AD - a document describing a resident's wishes for care if they became incapacitated) for 6 of 20 residents (Residents 5, 49, 9, 1, 2 & 54) reviewed for guardianship/advance directives. This failure left residents at risk for losing the right to have their preferences and choices honored during emergent and end-of-life care.Findings included .<Facility Policy>According to the facility's revised September 2022 Advanced Directives policy, the resident had the right to formulate an advanced directive (AD) and advance directives were honored in accordance with state law and facility policy. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF628Aug 28, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a system by which residents received required written notices at the time of transfer and/or discharge, or as soon as practicable for 3 (Residents 5, 10 & 82), offer a bed hold for 2 (Resident 10 & 82), notify the office of the Long Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) for 1 (Resident 12), and provide discharge planning for 2 (Residents 1 & 43) of 7 residents reviewed for hospitalizations and discharges. These failures placed residents at risk of being uninformed about their discharge rights, the cost of holding the resident's bed while hospitalized , and a decreased quality of life.Findings included .<Facility Policy>The facility's October 2016, Supplement to Health Facility admission Agreement showed residents who were being… […]

Read 30 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 30 of 194 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 28, 2025Standard20 findings
  • May 9, 2024Standard17 findings
  • Jan 12, 2023Standard20 findings
  • Apr 22, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 27, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 17, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 3, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 16, 2020Standard13 findings
Show the 11 earlier surveys
  • Aug 2, 2019Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 7, 2018Standard and complaint18 findings · 3 harm
  • Jul 18, 2017Standard16 findings
  • Aug 9, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 28, 2016Standard and complaint11 findings · 1 harm
  • May 26, 2015Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • May 22, 2015Standard and complaint13 findings · 2 harm
  • Jun 26, 2014Standard14 findings
  • Apr 19, 2013—11 findings
  • Apr 10, 2012—19 findings
  • Jun 10, 2011—13 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction