Lake Mills Health Services
Lake Mills, Wisconsin · CCN 525314
30 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 131
- Surveys
- 30
- Harm or worse
- 13
- Immediate jeopardy
- 5
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 50
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- NORTH SHORE HEALTHCARE
- County
- Jefferson · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1981
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 92 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Wisconsin.
Last survey on record
Jul 3, 2025
494 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.54 | 3.73 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.52 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 37.9% | 45.7% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $120,900 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J15.6% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1372.2% | E15.6% | F15.6% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C211.1% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6862×
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5631×
Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
- F5721×
Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Lake Mills Health Services, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, widespreadF880Jan 12, 2021
Based on record review, interview and observation, the facility did not follow professional standards of practice and its own written policies and procedures designed to help prevent the development and transmission of COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019), potentially affecting all 29 residents who resided at the facility at the time of the survey. * CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant)-M was not screened upon starting her work shift and later developed signs and symptoms and tested positive for COVID-19. CNA-M was identified by the facility as the index case for the facility's outbreak of COVID-19 that began on 12/23/20. * Facility staff were screened at the start of their shift and found to have signs and symptoms of COVID-19. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF686Jul 3, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents with a pressure injury or at risk for pressure injuries received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent the development of pressure injuries and to promote healing for 2 (R1 andR4) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. * R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a hospital discharge summary that included treatment for R1’s right ischium. This treatment was not picked up by the facility. On 5/14/25, the facility documented a stage 2 pressure injury (PI) to R1’s right buttock. Wound Physician-G’s treatment recommendation for the right buttock was not completed by the facility. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF622Mar 22, 2022
Based on record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure a safe discharge for 1 Resident (R) (R1) of 1 resident. reviewed for discharge. R1 had a diagnosis [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . In addition, R1 required staff assistance with ADLs (activities of daily living) such as bathing, dressing and personal hygiene. R1's care plan indicated R1 had poor safety awareness and judgement. When R1's skilled nursing coverage ended on 2/23/22, R1 was eligible to remain in the facility under custodial care for a total of 90 days until R1 could disenroll from R1's HMO (health maintenance organization) and transition to straight Medicaid. Despite notification from R1's HMO that R1's stay was covered, the facility discharged R1 to a homeless shelter. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF745Mar 22, 2022
Based on record review and resident and staff interview, the facility did not provide medically-related social services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for 1 Resident (R) (R1) of 1 resident. When R1's skilled nursing coverage ended on 2/23/22, R1's HMO (health maintenance organization) informed the facility via fax and voicemails that R1 was eligible to remain in the facility under custodial care. The fax was not acknowledged and the voicemails went unreturned. In addition, a copy of the notice of denial of skilled coverage with information on appeal rights was not provided to R1 and the ADRC was not contacted on R1's behalf. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Aug 3, 2026
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents with pressure injuries received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing and prevent new pressure injuries from developing for 2 (R20 and R3) of 4 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. *R20 has a history of pressure injuries and is at risk for developing pressure injuries. Facility staff did not put resident-specific care plan interventions in place to prevent the development of pressure injuries. R20 developed a stage 3 pressure injury to R20's left outer ankle. *R3 did not receive care to prevent the development of an unstageable pressure injury (PI) to R3's left foreskin. […]
Read 30 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 30 of 131 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 3, 2026Standard7 findings · 2 harm
- Jul 3, 2025Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 26, 2025Standard3 findings
- Feb 8, 2024Standard3 findings
- Oct 10, 2023Complaint3 findings
- Oct 17, 2022Standard5 findings
- Mar 22, 2022Complaint5 findings · 2 harm
- Aug 31, 2021Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
Show the 22 earlier surveys
- Jul 1, 2021Standard15 findings
- Jan 12, 2021Infection control8 findings · 3 harm
- Oct 20, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Aug 25, 2020Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 8, 2019Standard and complaint19 findings
- Nov 20, 2018Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 19, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Feb 15, 2018Standard9 findings
- Jul 26, 2017Complaint4 findings
- Jun 23, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Mar 28, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Nov 30, 2016Standard2 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 11, 2016Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 8, 2015Standard2 findings
- May 21, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Aug 28, 2014Standard and complaint3 findings
- Nov 14, 2013—2 findings
- Jan 9, 2013—1 finding
- Sep 7, 2012—9 findings
- Oct 13, 2011—3 findings
- Mar 31, 2011—2 findings
- Oct 19, 2010—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Muskego Health and Rehabilitation CenterMuskego4 harm findings
- Oconto Health and Rehab CenterOconto4 harm findings
- Serenity Spring Senior Living at Scandia VillageSister Bay4 harm findings
- Little Chute Health ServicesLittle Chute7 harm findings
- Menomonee Falls Health ServicesMenomonee Falls8 harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction