Deficiency Index

Laguna Hills Health and Rehabilitation Center

Laguna Hills, California · CCN 056110

80 surveys since 2010, 7 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
408
Surveys
80
Harm or worse
7
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file54/80

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
208
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
CAMBRIDGE HEALTHCARE SERVICES
County
Orange
Medicare-certified since
1971

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
3
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 225 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in California.

Last survey on record

Jul 9, 2026

123 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.914.08
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.38—
Annual nurse turnover39.7%37.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG10.7%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD11275.7%E138.8%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B2214.9%C—
CMS’s current file: 148 of the 408 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6849×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F5586×

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

  • F6896×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8806×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F7555×

    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Laguna Hills Health and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Aug 10, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary care and services were provided to prevent the worsening of pressure injuries and promote the healing of existing pressure injuries for two of four sampled residents (Residents 1 and 3). * Resident 3 had a Stage 2 pressure injury on the back upon admission to the facility on [DATE]. The facility failed to assess, measure, notify the physician to obtain a wound treatment order andimplement the necessary interventions to prevent further skin breakdown of Resident 3's Stage 2 pressure injury on the back. This failure resulted in Resident 3's Stage 2 pressure injury on the back deteriorating and developing into an unstageable pressure injury. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF726May 26, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure three of three nursing staff (CNAs 2 and 3, and LVN 4) interviewed demonstrated the competencies and skill sets needed to provide safe nursing care to the residents who were on anticoagulant medication. * CNAs 2 and 3 failed to explain failed to explain how to handle and care for residents that are on anticoagulant medication. * LVN 4 failed to explain what the main side effects to monitor for when the residents were on an anticoagulant medication. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689Aug 25, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the environment remained free from accident hazards for one of four final sampled residents (Resident 42) and two nonsampled residents (Residents 26 and 166) reviewed for accidents. * The facility failed to post signage on Resident 42's room to indicate the oxygen was in use. * The facility failed to ensure the resident rooms contained secured closet/storage cabinets for 103 of 103 resident rooms. * A pair of long scissors was observed on Resident 166's overbed table. These failures posed the risk for injuries to the residents, staff, and visitors.Findings: 1. On 8/19/25 at 1010 hours, an observation was conducted of Resident Room E. Resident 26 resided in Room E. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Aug 25, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure Station A ice machine drainpipe maintained an air gap (space between the water outlet and the flood level of the drain that prevents backflow of waste water from the drain) at the floor sink drain. This failure had the potential to result in waterborne illnesses in a highly susceptible resident population. * The facility failed to ensure proper storage of refrigerated food in the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen equipment was clean and in good condition. * The facility failed to ensure the broom and dustpan were stored in a sanitary manner. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689Aug 19, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure the facility's four of four dryers and two of 35 final sampled residents (Residents 13 and 87) were free from accident hazards. * The facility failed to ensure the lint screen on all four dryers were brushed and cleaned after every load or every hour per the facility's P&P. In addition, the facility failed to ensure there were no exposed foam in one dryer causing the lint to stick to the foam, and the lint was not removed thoroughly. […]

Read 27 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 27 of 408 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 9, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 3, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • May 26, 2026Complaint3 findings
  • Apr 16, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 7, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 26, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 4, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 11, 2025Complaint3 findings
Show the 72 earlier surveys
  • Aug 25, 2025Standard and complaint29 findings
  • Jul 15, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 4, 2025Complaint3 findings
  • Jan 24, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 3, 2025Complaint3 findings
  • Oct 14, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 25, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 27, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • Aug 19, 2024Standard and complaint34 findings
  • Jul 1, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • May 8, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 13, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 2, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 3, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 5, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 13, 2023Standard and complaint38 findings
  • Aug 10, 2023Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 2, 2023Complaint5 findings
  • May 31, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • May 2, 2023Complaint3 findings
  • Apr 14, 2023Complaint3 findings
  • Apr 13, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 14, 2023Complaint4 findings
  • Nov 22, 2022Infection control1 finding
  • Sep 13, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 17, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 22, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 10, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 26, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 24, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 11, 2021Standard13 findings
  • Mar 4, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 12, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • May 19, 2020Complaint3 findings
  • Dec 26, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 25, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Nov 21, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 1, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 13, 2019Complaint4 findings
  • Jun 11, 2019Standard18 findings
  • May 29, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Nov 20, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 22, 2018Complaint4 findings
  • Oct 17, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 25, 2018Standard12 findings
  • May 24, 2018Complaint3 findings
  • Mar 19, 2018Complaint8 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 14, 2017Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 30, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 26, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 15, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 8, 2017Standard13 findings
  • Feb 6, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 3, 2016Standard11 findings
  • Nov 4, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 21, 2015Complaint7 findings
  • Sep 15, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 25, 2015Complaint3 findings
  • Jun 15, 2015Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • May 13, 2015Standard27 findings
  • Oct 16, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 4, 2014Standard13 findings
  • Aug 29, 2013—1 finding
  • Aug 1, 2013—1 finding
  • Jun 18, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
  • May 13, 2013—1 finding
  • Feb 22, 2013—17 findings
  • Sep 10, 2012—2 findings
  • Jul 3, 2012—1 finding
  • Apr 17, 2012—1 finding
  • Feb 27, 2012Standard16 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 6, 2010—34 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction