Deficiency Index

Kern River Transitional Care

Bakersfield, California · CCN 555912

66 surveys since 2019, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
154
Surveys
66
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2019–2026
’19’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse2

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file36/66

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
140
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
PACS GROUP
County
Kern
Medicare-certified since
2019

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
2
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 225 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in California.

Last survey on record

Apr 29, 2026

194 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.524.08
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.54—
Annual nurse turnover48.3%37.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$77,720 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG11.1%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD7579.8%E1313.8%F55.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 94 of the 154 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6569×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6588×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F5805×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F6094×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F8424×

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Kern River Transitional Care, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Dec 7, 2023

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent abuse for one of 10 sampled residents (Resident 3). This failure resulted in Resident 3 to express feelings of sadness, cry, verbalize a fear of retaliation from staff and had the potential to affect other residents in a negative manner. Findings: During a review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (Assessment tool) BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status- an assessment tool for cognition), dated 9/8/23, the BIMS indicated, Resident 3 had a score of 12 (moderate impairment). During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/19/23 at 11:46 a.m. with Resident 3 in Resident 3's room, Resident 3 stated, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 9 had been shouting at her. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF697Sep 1, 2022

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure: 1. An accurate pain assessment was done for one of one sampled resident (Resident 1). 2. physician's orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . These failures resulted in Resident 1 suffering from severe pain (scale of 0 = no pain, 1 to 3 = mild pain, 4 to 6 = moderate pain, 7 to 10 = severe pain) and caused a delay in treatment for [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 1's Physicians Order (PO), dated 2/10/22, the PO indicated, Resident 1 had an order/start date on 12/30/21 for Monitor and Record Pain Assessment Level q [every] shift 0 = No pain, 1-3 = Mild, 4-8 = Moderate, 7-10 = Severe. During a review of Resident 1's physician's orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF552Apr 24, 2025

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Follow their policy and procedure titled Psychoactive/Psychotropic Medication Use, when Informed Consents (process to ensure the provider has discussed the risks, benefits, and alternatives with the patient and the patient agrees to the provider performing the intervention) were not provided by the physician or consistently witnessed by a licensed nurse for eight of 14 sampled residents (Resident 437, Resident 111, Resident 10, Resident 338, Resident 25, Resident 8, Resident 55, and Resident 36 ) on psychotropic medications, (medications to treat mental health disorders). This failure had the potential for residents or their responsible party to be unaware of alternatives to medications or side effects of medications. 2. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF726Apr 24, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1.Ensure three of 32 sampled licensed vocational nurses (LVN 2, LVN 3, and TN 2) were competent (verified ability to perform skill) to perform care for one of one sampled resident (Resident 72) on dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly). 2. Ensure three of 32 sampled licensed vocational nurses (LVN 2, LVN 3, and treatment nurse [TN] 2) were competent to provide care for one of one sampled resident (Resident 36) with suprapubic catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine). 3. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Apr 24, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow and implement the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, nationally recognized health organization) infection control practices when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 did not follow Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP, precautions to reduce transmission of infectious organisms) protocols during closed contact with one of one sampled resident (Resident 72). 2. The X-ray Technician (XRT) stepped out of the room with contaminated gloves and isolation gown to answer a phone call after in close contact with one of one resident (Resident 96) on EBP. 3a. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 154 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 29, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 28, 2025Complaint4 findings
  • May 16, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • May 15, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 24, 2025Standard22 findings
  • Feb 25, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 31, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 9, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 58 earlier surveys
  • Dec 5, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 5, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 22, 2024Complaint4 findings
  • Aug 2, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 31, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 23, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • Jul 16, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 9, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 28, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 25, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • May 16, 2024Standard and complaint15 findings
  • Apr 16, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 9, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 17, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 26, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 8, 2024Complaint4 findings
  • Jan 10, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 5, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 7, 2023Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 11, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 3, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 26, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • May 4, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 28, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 1, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 7, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 29, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 24, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 3, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 1, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Aug 11, 2022Complaint9 findings
  • Jul 19, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 18, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 12, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 6, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 12, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 28, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 24, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 31, 2022Infection control1 finding
  • Oct 5, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 4, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 16, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 20, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • May 13, 2021Standard11 findings
  • Apr 7, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 2, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 9, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 12, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 17, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Sep 15, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Sep 1, 2020Complaint3 findings
  • Aug 27, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Aug 6, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Feb 6, 2020Standard5 findings
  • Dec 19, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 5, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 9, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 5, 2019Standard6 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction