Deficiency Index

La Belle Manor Care Center

La Belle, Missouri · CCN 265646

18 surveys since 2011, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
96
Surveys
18
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse4

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file14/18

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
94
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Independent
County
Lewis · rural
Medicare-certified since
1996

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
2
Staffing
1
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 113 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Missouri.

Last survey on record

May 30, 2025

528 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.833.32
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.27—
Annual nurse turnover68.6%60.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD628.6%E1361.9%F14.8%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C14.8%
CMS’s current file: 21 of the 96 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F6041×

    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.

  • F6091×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6361×

    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at La Belle Manor Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF641May 30, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by staff, according to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual for three sampled residents (Resident #4, #8 and #20), in a review of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 35. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, version 1.18.11, dated October 2023, showed the following: -Medicare and Medicaid participating long-term care facilities are required to conduct comprehensive, accurate, standardized and reproducible assessments of each resident's functional capacity and health status; -The RAI process has multiple regulatory requirements. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656May 30, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for four residents (Resident #3, #10, #14 and #26), in a review of 13 residents. The facility census was 35. Review of the undated facility policy, Comprehensive Care Plan Policy, showed the following: -A comprehensive care plan is a detailed document outlining a resident's agreed-upon goals of care and the planned activities for their medical, nursing and allied health care. It reflects shared decisions made with the resident, their caregivers and family, about tests, interventions, treatments and other activities needed to achieve these goals. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657May 30, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to update and revise problems and interventions on resident care plans to reflect current care needs for three residents (Resident #10, #4 and #1) in a sample of 13 residents and failed to include Resident #20's responsible party and Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) in his/her care planning decision making. The facility census was 35. Review of the undated facility policy, Resident Plan of Care, showed the following: -It is the policy of the facility to initiate a resident's plan of care on admission, by charge nurse, that is located in the electronic health record; -The MDS Coordinator follows electronic health record for date of plan of care to be completed. The facility did not provide a care plan revisions policy. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF688May 30, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative nursing services as recommended to assist one resident (Resident #3), in a review of 13 residents, and two additional residents (Resident #18 and #24), with mobility and/or limited range of motion (ROM) to attain or maintain their highest level of functioning. The facility census was 35. Review of the undated facility policy, Restorative Nursing Program Policy, showed the following: -Non-skilled rehabilitation: Restorative nursing provides non-skilled rehabilitative care with focus on maintaining or improving daily living skills; -Restorative aides and nurses must be trained. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF700May 30, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess seven residents (Residents #10, #3, #20, #189, #9, #36, and #35), in a review of 13 sampled residents, for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation, and failed to review the risk and benefits of the bed rails with the resident or resident representative and obtain consent prior to installation. The facility census was 35. Review of the Food and Drug Administration's Guide of Bed Safety, Bed Rails in Hospitals, Nursing Homes and Home Health Care: The Facts, revised April 2010, showed the following: -Patients who have problems with memory, sleeping, incontinence, pain, uncontrolled body movement, or who get out of bed and walk unsafely without assistance, must be carefully assessed for the best… […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 96 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 30, 2025Standard14 findings
  • Nov 15, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 30, 2023Standard3 findings
  • Feb 2, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 25, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Jun 2, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jan 10, 2020Standard2 findings
  • Nov 1, 2019Complaint1 finding
Show the 10 earlier surveys
  • Feb 11, 2019Standard7 findings
  • Jan 5, 2018Standard11 findings
  • Nov 9, 2016Standard8 findings
  • Oct 7, 2015Standard12 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 9, 2014Standard11 findings
  • Nov 27, 2013—3 findings
  • Sep 12, 2012—9 findings
  • Jun 28, 2012—2 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 6, 2012—1 finding
  • Nov 9, 2011Standard7 findings · 2 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction