Deficiency Index

Kensington Health and Rehabilitation

Mobile, Alabama · CCN 015429

14 surveys since 2011, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
50
Surveys
14
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2011–2022
’11’15’20’22
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file12/14

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
120
Ownership
For profit - Partnership
Chain
WELLINGTON HEALTH CARE SERVICES
County
Mobile
Medicare-certified since
1995

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
4
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=2, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Feb 18, 2022

1,725 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.643.73
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.86—
Annual nurse turnover36.9%51.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$4,558 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD9100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 9 of the 50 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Kensington Health and Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF758Feb 18, 2022

    Based on record review, interviews, and review of facility policies titled, Behavioral Assessment, Intervention, and Monitoring, Mood and Behavior, and Antipsychotic Medication Use, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #75 received adequate monitoring related to the use of antipsychotic and antidepressant medications. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. to ensure RI #75 was monitored for behaviors for which an antipsychotic medication ([MEDICATION(S)]) was administered. This deficient practice affected RI #75, one of three sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications who received an antipsychotic medication; and 2. to ensure RI #75 was monitored for side effects of an antipsychotic ([MEDICATION(S)]) and an antidepressant ([MEDICATION(S)]) medication. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF759Feb 18, 2022

    Based on record review, observations, interviews, and review of a facility policy titled, Administration of Medications, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate less than 5%. There were 3 errors in 33 opportunities, which resulted in a 9.09% medication error rate involving Resident Identifier (RI) #62 and RI #20 during medication pass. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1. RI #62 received a Senna tablet and a multivitamin with mineral tablet as ordered by the physician; and 2. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 50 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Feb 18, 2022Standard2 findings
  • Nov 21, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 11, 2019Standard7 findings
  • Jun 21, 2018Standard4 findings
  • Jun 1, 2017Standard3 findings · 2 harm
  • May 26, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Aug 27, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 23, 2015Standard5 findings
Show the 6 earlier surveys
  • Jul 17, 2014Standard3 findings
  • Aug 22, 2013—3 findings
  • Jun 20, 2013Standard9 findings
  • May 10, 2012—3 findings
  • Mar 19, 2012—2 findings · 2 harm
  • Apr 7, 2011—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction