Kensington Health and Rehabilitation
Mobile, Alabama · CCN 015429
14 surveys since 2011, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 50
- Surveys
- 14
- Harm or worse
- 4
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 120
- Ownership
- For profit - Partnership
- Chain
- WELLINGTON HEALTH CARE SERVICES
- County
- Mobile
- Medicare-certified since
- 1995
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=2, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Feb 18, 2022
1,725 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.64 | 3.73 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.86 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 36.9% | 51.3% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $4,558 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D9100.0% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Kensington Health and Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF758Feb 18, 2022
Based on record review, interviews, and review of facility policies titled, Behavioral Assessment, Intervention, and Monitoring, Mood and Behavior, and Antipsychotic Medication Use, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #75 received adequate monitoring related to the use of antipsychotic and antidepressant medications. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. to ensure RI #75 was monitored for behaviors for which an antipsychotic medication ([MEDICATION(S)]) was administered. This deficient practice affected RI #75, one of three sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications who received an antipsychotic medication; and 2. to ensure RI #75 was monitored for side effects of an antipsychotic ([MEDICATION(S)]) and an antidepressant ([MEDICATION(S)]) medication. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF759Feb 18, 2022
Based on record review, observations, interviews, and review of a facility policy titled, Administration of Medications, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate less than 5%. There were 3 errors in 33 opportunities, which resulted in a 9.09% medication error rate involving Resident Identifier (RI) #62 and RI #20 during medication pass. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1. RI #62 received a Senna tablet and a multivitamin with mineral tablet as ordered by the physician; and 2. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 50 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Feb 18, 2022Standard2 findings
- Nov 21, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Jul 11, 2019Standard7 findings
- Jun 21, 2018Standard4 findings
- Jun 1, 2017Standard3 findings · 2 harm
- May 26, 2016Standard3 findings
- Aug 27, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Apr 23, 2015Standard5 findings
Show the 6 earlier surveys
- Jul 17, 2014Standard3 findings
- Aug 22, 2013—3 findings
- Jun 20, 2013Standard9 findings
- May 10, 2012—3 findings
- Mar 19, 2012—2 findings · 2 harm
- Apr 7, 2011—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction