Deficiency Index

Barfield Health Care

Guntersville, Alabama · CCN 015225

9 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
20
Surveys
9
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2021
’11’15’20’21
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file7/9

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
113
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
REHAB SELECT
County
Marshall · rural
Medicare-certified since
1979

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=2, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Apr 16, 2021

2,033 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.293.73
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.40—
Annual nurse turnover57.1%51.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 3 of the 20 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Barfield Health Care, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF602Apr 16, 2021

    Based on interviews, review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prevention, the facility's investigation file, and Resident Identifier (RI) #48 and RI #56's medical record, the facility failed to ensure Employee Identifier (EI) #4, a Registered Nurse (RN) did not take for personal use and without the residents' permission narcotic pain medication which belonged to RI #48 and RI #56, two of four residents reviewed for narcotic pain medication. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, ABUSE PREVENTION, dated 11/28/2016, documented . IV. IDENTIFICATION . 3. Staff are trained on actual activities that would constitute abuse and they are but not limited to: . b. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880Apr 16, 2021

    Based on observation, interviews, medical record review, and review of facility policy titled, CAPILLARY BLOOD SAMPLING, the facility failed to ensure Employee Identifier (EI) #3, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), wore gloves when she performed a fingerstick blood sugar (FSBS) on Resident Identifier (RI) #62, one of two residents observed for medication administration. Findings include: The facility's undated policy titled, CAPILLARY BLOOD SAMPLING, documented: . Procedure 1. Perform hand hygiene. 2. Wear gloves . RI #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. RI #62 has a medical history to include a diagnosis [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] During medication administration observation on 4/14/2021 at 5:17 PM, EI #3, a LPN, was to obtain RI #62's FSBS with her bare hands. […]

Read 19 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 19 of 20 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 16, 2021Standard and complaint2 findings
  • Sep 7, 2018Standard1 finding
  • Jul 28, 2017Standard5 findings
  • Jun 9, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Jun 18, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Jun 26, 2014Standard3 findings
  • Jun 7, 2013—1 finding
  • Apr 19, 2012—1 finding
Show the 1 earlier survey
  • Mar 17, 2011—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction