John Paul II Nursing Home
Kenedy, Texas · CCN 45E409
13 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2021.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 34
- Surveys
- 13
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 58
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Karnes · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1976
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=16, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Sep 12, 2025
423 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.30 | 4.47 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.40 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 24.1% | 37.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D555.6% | E444.4% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at John Paul II Nursing Home, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF689Feb 5, 2021
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 2 of 12 residents (Residents #26 and #9) reviewed for accidents in that: 1. Resident #26 fell fifteen times in a seven month period and sustained a laceration and a fracture. 2. Resident #9 fell four times in a six month period and sustained a laceration and a head injury. This failure resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation on 02/02/2021. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF730Jun 30, 2023
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a performance review at least once every 12 months and provide regular in-service education based on the outcome of these reviews for 6 of 6 CNA's, NA's or RA's (RA F, NA G, NA H, NA I, NA J, NA K) reviewed for performance reviews, in that: The facility failed to conduct performance reviews at least every 12 months for RA F, NA G, NA H, NA I, NA J, NA K. This failure could result in residents not receiving the necessary care and services due to nurse aides not receiving training based on their performance review outcome. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jun 30, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen (Main Kitchen), in that: The facility failed to ensure an opened items in the reach in refrigerators were dated or discarded correctly This deficient practice could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk for foodborne illness. The findings included: During an observation, in the dry storage area, on 06/27/2023 at 11:59 a.m., revealed a box container of Idaho potatoes with a received date of 06.23.2023, but no opened date. During an observation, in the walk-in refrigerator, on 06/27/2023 at 12:04 p.m., revealed one 32 oz. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF944Jun 30, 2023
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) training that outlines and informs staff of the elements and goals of the facility's QAPI program for 10 of 16 employees (RA F, NA G, NA H, NA I, NA J, NA K, LVN L, RN M, LVN N, LVN O) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure RA F, NA G, NA H, NA I, NA J, NA K, LVN L, RN M, LVN N, LVN O completed QAPI training within the last year. These failures could affect residents and place them at risk of poor care or victimization due to lack of staff training. Findings included: a. Record review of Staff Roster, dated 06/30/2023, revealed RA F was hired on 09/15/2014. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF949Jun 30, 2023
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide mandatory effective behavioral health training for 16 of 16 employees (RA F, NA G, NA H, NA I, NA J, NA K, LVN L, RN M, LVN N, LVN O, MR, DM, AD, DON, MDS Coordinator and SW)reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure RA F, NA G, NA H, NA I, NA J, NA K, LVN L, RN M, LVN N, LVN O, MR, DM, AD, DON, MDS Coordinator and SW completed behavioral health training within the previous year. This failure could place residents at risk of not attaining or maintaining their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being due to lack of staff training. The findings included: a. Record review of Staff Roster, dated 06/30/2023, revealed RA F was hired on 09/15/2014. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 34 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Sep 12, 2025Standard3 findings
- Aug 9, 2024Standard and complaint1 finding
- Jun 30, 2023Standard5 findings
- May 18, 2022Complaint2 findings
- Dec 17, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Feb 5, 2021Standard and complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- May 31, 2019Standard2 findings
- May 10, 2018Standard3 findings
Show the 5 earlier surveys
- Jun 21, 2017Standard3 findings
- Apr 28, 2016Standard3 findings
- Apr 16, 2014Standard2 findings
- Mar 14, 2013—4 findings
- May 19, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction