Jefferson City Manor Care Center
Jefferson City, Missouri · CCN 265285
29 surveys since 2011, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 83
- Surveys
- 29
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 102
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Cole
- Medicare-certified since
- 1985
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 1
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 118 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Missouri.
Last survey on record
Apr 7, 2026
216 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.62 | 3.32 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.31 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 85.4% | 57.7% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $8,340 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G25.0% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1742.5% | E1537.5% | F37.5% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C37.5% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6583×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F6552×
Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6572×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Jefferson City Manor Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF760Nov 27, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to ensure the residnet was free from a significant medication error when staff failed to administer of one resident's (Resident #1) Metolazone (a diuretic medication used to treat high blood pressure and edema) and Torsemide (a diuretic medication used to treat edema due to congestive heart failure (CHF), kidney disease, or liver disease) as directed by the physician and failed to notify the resident's physician the medication was not available to be administer which resulted in the resident being admitted to the hospital with acute chronic hypoxic respiratory failure (not enough oxygen in the blood), mild pulmonary edema with pleural effusion (fluid collected inside and outside of the lungs), and chronic kidney… […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Jan 30, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to provide care consistent with professional standards of practice to promote the prevention of pressure ulcer (PU) development for one resident (Resident #52) after staff identified the resident was at risk for PUs. Additionally, staff failed to obtain a physician ordered treatment for an unstageable wound to the resident's coccyx, from 11/16/22 to 12/22/22, more than 30 days after the start of the PU, failed to obtain a physician ordered treatment for an unstageable PU to the resident's left hip discovered on 12/31/22, failed to follow the resident's plan of care to prevent additional pressure injuries (PI)s and promote the healing of PUs. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF838Apr 7, 2026
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to conduct and document an annual facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies as required. The facility census was 70.1. Review of the facility's Facility Assessment policy, revised October 2018, showed the facility assessment is conducted annually to determine and update the capacity to meet the need of and competently care for the residents during day-to-day operations. Determining our capacity to meet the needs of and care for the residents during emergencies is included in this assessment. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jun 7, 2024
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to store food in a manner to prevent potential contamination and out-dated use. Facility staff failed to maintain the kitchen equipment and surfaces in a sanitary manner to prevent the growth of bacteria and cross-contamination. Facility staff failed to maintain and serve food at temperatures adequate to prevent food borne illness. The facility staff failed to ensure the ice machine, used to supply ice to residents, drained through an air gap to prevent cross-contamination. These failures have the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 72. 1. Review of the facility's policies showed the facility did not provide a policy for food dating and storage. 2. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jan 30, 2023
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure the ice bin drained through an air gap. Facility staff failed to maintain the ceiling over the food preparation and service area in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all facility residents. The census was 80. 1. Review of the facility's policies showed the facility did not have a policy which addressed the inspection and maintenance of the ice machine. Observation on 1/26/23 at 1:00 P.M., showed the ice machine, located in the kitchen, did not drain through an air gap. […]
Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 83 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 7, 2026Complaint4 findings
- Feb 11, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Dec 12, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Nov 17, 2025Complaint1 finding
- May 8, 2025Standard and complaint8 findings
- Mar 21, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Feb 21, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Dec 23, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 21 earlier surveys
- Sep 26, 2024Complaint4 findings
- Jun 7, 2024Standard4 findings
- Nov 27, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 30, 2023Standard12 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 7, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Oct 24, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Feb 13, 2020Standard1 finding
- Jul 17, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Nov 29, 2018Standard3 findings
- Jun 13, 2018Complaint1 finding
- May 3, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Mar 2, 2018Complaint3 findings
- Nov 1, 2017Standard5 findings
- Dec 9, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Nov 17, 2016Standard6 findings
- Oct 13, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Nov 25, 2015Standard3 findings
- Jan 23, 2015Standard and complaint4 findings
- Aug 19, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 20, 2012—4 findings
- Dec 1, 2011—5 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- River Crossing Rehab and Healthcare CenterSaint Louis2 harm findings
- Truman Lake Manor IncLowry City2 harm findings
- Life Care Center of St LouisSaint Louis1 harm finding
- Aspire Senior Living Excelsior SpringsExcelsior Springsno harm findings
- Clinton Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterClinton3 harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction