Deficiency Index

Iredell Memorial Hospital Inc

Statesville, North Carolina · CCN 345306

12 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
34
Surveys
12
Harm or worse
7
Immediate jeopardy
7
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy7

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file9/12

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
48
Ownership
Non profit - Other
Chain
Independent
County
Iredell
Medicare-certified since
1989

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
5
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=7, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Mar 5, 2026

249 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day6.175.15
Registered-nurse hours per resident day2.08—
Annual nurse turnover51.6%32.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 3 of the 34 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Iredell Memorial Hospital Inc, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF627Mar 5, 2026

    Based on record review, staff, and family interviews, the facility failed to have an effective discharge planning process that ensured home health services were set up prior to discharge to the community for a resident who had a wound vac (a therapeutic device that uses controlled negative pressure [suction] to accelerate the healing of acute or chronic wounds). This failure was for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for discharge (Resident #64).The findings included:Resident #64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included history of sleeve gastrectomy (a common, irreversible weight-loss surgery), Surgical wound dehiscence (the partial or total separation of previously stitched surgical incision edges), encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery of the digestive… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF758Jan 9, 2025

    Based on record review, and staff, Nurse Practitioner, and Pharmacy Clinical Director interviews, the facility failed to have a documented diagnosis for the use of an antipsychotic medication (Seroquel/quetiapine) for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #54). The findings included: Resident #54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anxiety and hypertension. Review of Resident #54's care plan initiated on 12/02/24 revealed she had a care plan for the use of psychotropic medications. A physician order dated 12/02/24 read; quetiapine (an antipsychotic medication) 25mg - give 1 tablet at bedtime. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF698Oct 27, 2023

    Based on record review, staff interviews, Assistant Director of Dialysis and Medical Director interview, the facility failed to monitor and assess the right subclavian catheter (temporary or permanent, simple, tunneled, or connected to a port under the skin to provide dialysis treatment) and the left arteriovenous dialysis fistula (AVF is a fistula created between an artery and a vein to provide dialysis treatments) for a resident receiving hemodialysis for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #7). Findings included: Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of renal insufficiency and treatment with renal dialysis. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF757Aug 6, 2021

    Based on record reviews, staff interviews and nurse practitioner interview, the facility failed to follow the medication order for [MEDICATION(S)] (a medication that lowers blood pressure) and administered the [MEDICATION(S)] outside of the parameters specified in the physician order for [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Findings included: Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed Resident #43 was cognitively intact. August 2021 physician orders revealed an order for [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] #43 showed a parameter for the order that stated to hold if systolic blood pressure was less than 100. The start date for this order was 6/23/2021. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF758Aug 6, 2021

    Based on observations, record review, staff interviews and pharmacy consultant interview, the facility failed to give a clinical indication for a scheduled antipsychotic medication and failed to ensure physician orders for as needed (PRN) antipsychotic medication was time limited in duration for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #281) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings included: Resident #281 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of [CONDITION(S)], generalized weakness and recent history of Covid-19. There was no psychiatric diagnosis listed in Resident #281's medical record. No Minimum Data Set assessment was available due to Resident #281 was a new admission. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 34 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 5, 2026Standard1 finding
  • Jan 9, 2025Standard1 finding
  • Oct 27, 2023Standard1 finding
  • Jul 22, 2022Standard2 findings
  • Aug 6, 2021Standard2 findings
  • Jan 17, 2019Standard1 finding
  • Jan 19, 2017Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Apr 20, 2016Complaint7 findings · 7 harm
Show the 4 earlier surveys
  • Dec 30, 2015Standard3 findings
  • Mar 18, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Oct 5, 2012—5 findings
  • Sep 1, 2011—7 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction