Deficiency Index

Ingleside at King Farm

Rockville, Maryland · CCN 215353

13 surveys since 2010, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
53
Surveys
13
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file11/13

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
45
Ownership
Non profit - Other
Chain
INGLESIDE ENGAGED LIVING
County
Montgomery
Medicare-certified since
2009

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
5
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=19, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Mar 31, 2026

223 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day5.284.75
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.27—
Annual nurse turnover14.9%27.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1789.5%E15.3%F15.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 19 of the 53 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Ingleside at King Farm, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Feb 19, 2025

    Based on observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in a manner that maintained professional standards of food service safety. This practice had the potential to affect all residents who eat the food prepared in the facility's kitchen. The findings include: On [DATE] at 8:05 AM, during a tour of the main kitchen, the Surveyor observed the produce refrigerator. The Surveyor observed an opened and unlabeled bag of carrots, bag of lettuce, and bag of spinach. During a continued tour of the kitchen, the Surveyor observed the meat/fish cooler. The Surveyor observed an uncovered large tub of apple cider and uncovered pan of greens on a short metal rolling cart. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF921Mar 31, 2026

    Based on observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment for residents, staff and the public. This was evident during the initial kitchen tour of the annual survey. The findings include:At 10:30 AM, the surveyor observed steam escaping from both ends of the high temperature conveyor dish machine and scattering throughout the dish machine room. In addition, the surfaces and the open seams of the two vent stacks were found to be covered in an excessive buildup of black substances. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF712Mar 31, 2026

    Based on a medical record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that residents were seen by an attending provider at least every 60 days. This was evident for 1 (Resident #5) of 1 resident reviewed for hospice care.The findings include:A review of Resident #5's medical record on 3/26/26 at 1:11 PM revealed attending provider visit notes for 3/4/25, 3/5/25, 3/10/25, 3/12/25, 3/31/25, 4/1/25, 4/8/25, 4/11/25, 4/21/25, 4/28/25, and 6/18/25. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF756Mar 31, 2026

    Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that attending physicians reviewed and acted on Irregularities identified by the pharmacist in a timely manner. This was evident for one (Resident #4) of 5 Residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.The findings include:A medical record review on 3/30/26 at 7:33 AM showed that Resident #4 had been residing in the facility since 2019 and received multiple drugs, including an antidepressant.The ongoing review included monthly medication review (MRR) notes for Resident #4 from March 2025 to the present. On 8/8/2025, there was a recommendation stating, This resident has been using DULOXETINE 60mg QD [every day] since 9/11/20. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF908Mar 31, 2026

    Based on observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain essential equipment in proper operating conditions. This was evident for 2 of 2 pieces of equipment reviewed during the annual survey.The findings include:All essential kitchen equipment, including but not limited to walk-in coolers, steam tables, dishwashers, convection ovens, stoves, and warming cabinets, must be maintained in safe operating condition in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and remain accessible throughout kitchen operations.On 03/26/2026 at 9:50 AM, an initial kitchen tour was conducted with Staff #4 and Staff #6. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 53 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 31, 2026Standard4 findings
  • Feb 19, 2025Standard and complaint15 findings
  • Apr 24, 2019Standard1 finding
  • Apr 26, 2018Standard6 findings
  • Mar 30, 2017Standard3 findings
  • Apr 15, 2016Standard3 findings
  • May 1, 2015Standard1 finding
  • May 14, 2014Standard2 findings
Show the 5 earlier surveys
  • May 17, 2013—5 findings
  • Jun 12, 2012—2 findings
  • Apr 5, 2012—3 findings
  • Jul 18, 2011—6 findings
  • Dec 22, 2010—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction