Asbury Solomons
Solomons, Maryland · CCN 215304
17 surveys since 2010, 1 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 42
- Surveys
- 17
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 48
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- ASBURY COMMUNITIES
- County
- Calvert
- Medicare-certified since
- 1997
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 15 not-for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Maryland.
Last survey on record
Jul 17, 2026
115 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.83 | 4.75 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.00 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 35.3% | 27.3% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2083.3% | E28.3% | F14.2% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C14.2% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F5781×
Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
- F5841×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Asbury Solomons, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jun 9, 2025
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to store food in a manner that maintains professional standards of food service safety. This practice had the potential to affect all residents eating food prepared by the facility's kitchen. The findings include: During the initial tour of the Kitchen with the Director of Dining on 6/03/25 at 9:06 AM there were foods found expired, and foods found open with no label showing expiration dates. The following foods were identified: In the Walk-in Refrigerator the following items were found expired. Meat wrapped in plastic and labeled Turkey, Cooked, Chilled, Use by Thursday 5/01. Cheese wrapped in plastic and labeled Cheese, opened (not in original package). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Dec 8, 2021
Based on observation and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure an effective infection prevention and control program by failing to ensure that staff utilized personal protective equipment (PPE) in a manner that met minimum standards and minimized risk for infectious spread. The noncompliant practice within the facility infection prevention and control program left all residents, staff, and visitors at increased risk for infection. The findings include: Consistent with the 4/2/2020 CMS guidance, on 4/27/2021, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published updated guidance which stated, In general, fully vaccinated HCP (health care provider) should continue to wear source control while at work. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF883Dec 8, 2021
Based on medical record review and interview it was determined the facility failed to have an effective system in place to assess residents' pneumonia vaccination status, adequate assessment of a resident's previous pneumonia vaccine administration is required in order to determine which pneumococcal vaccine is indicated and when it should be administered. This was found to be evident for 5 ( #34, #41, #18, #6,#33) of 5 residents reviewed for immunization status during the survey. The findings include: Review of the Pneumococcal Pneumonia Vaccination policy (revision date 10/1/21) revealed the facility will follow current CDC guidelines and best practices for the prevention and control of pneumococcal pneumonia. Procedures/Process includes: 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Jul 17, 2026
Based on a review of facility investigation documents, medical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to a resident identified as a wandering risk. This was evident in 1 (Resident #17) out of 1 resident reviewed for supervision during the recertification and complaint survey. The Findings include:A Wander Guard system is an electronic security solution used in long term care facilities to prevent at-risk residents from wandering off-site or into unsafe areas.During an interview with the ADON on 07/16/2026 the wander guard system was explained as a two step process. The sensor will give an audible alarm sound when warning that a resident wearing a wander guard sensor has approached an exit door or the elevator. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF550Dec 8, 2021
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide a resident with dignity and respect by dressing the resident in clothing that was labeled with the resident's name prominently displayed. This was evident for 3 (#42, #38, #33) of 3 residents observed wearing slipper socks during the annual survey. The findings include: On 12/1/21 at 9:48 AM observation was made of Resident #42 sitting in a wheelchair. Resident #42 was wearing slipper socks and the front shin area of the slipper socks was labeled with Resident #42's last name. On 12/3/21 at 12:48 PM observation was made of Resident #42 sitting in the dining room along with 2 other residents, Resident #38 and Resident #33. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 42 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 17, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jun 9, 2025Standard1 finding
- Dec 8, 2021Standard and complaint20 findings
- Oct 3, 2018Standard3 findings
- Sep 11, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Jan 5, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Jun 16, 2017Standard2 findings
- Apr 15, 2016Standard1 finding
Show the 9 earlier surveys
- Apr 9, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Dec 22, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Oct 9, 2014Complaint1 finding
- May 13, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Dec 5, 2013Standard1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 16, 2013—1 finding
- Sep 26, 2012—4 findings
- Aug 18, 2011—1 finding
- Sep 29, 2010—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction