Deficiency Index

Indian Creek Healthcare Center

Corydon, Indiana · CCN 155312

25 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
61
Surveys
25
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file17/25

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
135
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
COMMUNICARE HEALTH
County
Harrison
Medicare-certified since
1987

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
2
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 21 not-for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Indiana.

Last survey on record

Jul 19, 2026

113 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.383.63
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.37—
Annual nurse turnover35.8%45.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD975.0%E325.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 12 of the 61 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6002×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6091×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6231×

    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.

  • F6251×

    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.

  • F6411×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Indian Creek Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF744Mar 1, 2023

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate dementia care, related to behaviors, for a resident (Resident B) which resulted in a fractured right wrist and a left black eye for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dementia care. Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 2/28/23 at 11:35 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with behavioral disturbance, anxiety and affective mood disorder. The admission evaluation report, dated 2/23/23 at 3:00 p.m., indicated the resident had a non-pressure area which consisted of diffuse punctured areas to the bottom of the right foot. She was a risk for falls with interventions to keep the room well-lit and free of clutter. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF881Feb 20, 2023

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an infection prevention and control program related to the tracking and monitoring of infections and antibiotics was followed related to organisms and prescribing of antibiotics for UTIs. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 125 of 125 residents that reside in the facility. Findings include: The review of the Antibiotic Stewardship tracking log indicated the following information on residents with UTIs: In July 2022 there were 17 UTIs (urinary tract infections) on the tracking log, which included the number of cases of organizms identified: 2 Providencia Stuartii 3 Escherichia Coli 1 Escherichia Coli ESBL (Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase) 1 Pneumoniae E. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF842Jul 19, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure administered narcotic medications were documented on the controlled substance medication administration record for 6 of 6 residents reviewed for resident medical records. (Resident B, C, D, E, F and G) Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 7/19/26 at 10:49 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anxiety (the bodies natural response to stress) and malignant neoplasm of the tonsil (a type of head and neck cancer).The physician's order, dated 7/10/26, indicated the resident was to receive Clonazepam (medication for anxiety) 0.5 mg (milligrams) in the morning and evening for anxiety.The physician's order, dated 6/30/26, indicated the resident was to receive… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF623Jan 23, 2024

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 5 of 5 residents or responsible parties were provided written notice of Transfer/Discharge upon transfer to an acute care facility. (Residents 101, 26, 122, 83, and 103) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident 101 was reviewed on 1/17/24 at 2:05 p.m. The diagnosis included, but was not limited to, absence of parts of the digestive tract. The Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 1/5/24, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The nurse's note, dated 12/21/23 at 11:08 a.m., indicated the resident was lethargic with a temperature of 101.1 degrees Fahrenheit. Tylenol was given. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF625Jan 23, 2024

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 5 of 5 residents or responsible parties were provided written notice of and signed the facility's bed hold policy upon transfer to an acute care facility. (Residents 101, 26, 122, 83, and 103) Findings include: 1. The nurse's note, dated 12/21/23 at 11:08 a.m., indicated Resident 101 was lethargic with a temperature of 101.1 degrees Fahrenheit. Tylenol was given. The CMP (Comprehensive Metabolic Panel) liver enzymes were elevated, and the urine was bright orange with a strong noticeable odor. The NP (Nurse Practitioner) gave an order to transfer the resident to the ED (Emergency Department) at a local hospital. The resident's family was notified. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 61 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 19, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 2, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • May 12, 2026Standard1 finding
  • Nov 19, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 13, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 2, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 25, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 23, 2024Standard4 findings
Show the 17 earlier surveys
  • Mar 1, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 20, 2023Standard6 findings
  • Dec 2, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 10, 2022Standard3 findings
  • Jan 16, 2020Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 23, 2019Standard4 findings
  • May 31, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 12, 2018Standard3 findings
  • Feb 28, 2018Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 13, 2017Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Jun 7, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • May 24, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 24, 2016Standard and complaint1 finding
  • Oct 31, 2014Standard3 findings
  • Sep 10, 2013—7 findings
  • Jul 20, 2012—1 finding
  • May 19, 2011—7 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction