Deficiency Index

Imperial Healthcare Center

La Mirada, California · CCN 056115

34 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
165
Surveys
34
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse2

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file22/34

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
99
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
ABRAHAM BAK & MENACHEM GASTWIRTH
County
Los Angeles
Medicare-certified since
1977

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
2
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 423 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in California.

Last survey on record

Jun 15, 2026

147 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.064.16
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.38—
Annual nurse turnover24.2%37.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3777.1%E918.8%F24.2%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 48 of the 165 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6566×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F8806×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5804×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F6844×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Imperial Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Aug 27, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control practices were followed when: 1.The suction tubing and Yankauer suction tip (a medical tool used to clear blood, saliva, and other fluids from a patient's mouth and throat during procedures or emergencies) with the change date for two of two sampled residents (Resident 5 and Resident 16) and not keeping the suction tip in a clean covering for Resident 5. 2. Staff did not perform hand hygiene between handling meal trays, and beverages between Resident 24 and Resident 87. 3. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jul 16, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement effective infection prevention measures during a Coronavirus Disease outbreak ([COVID-19], an infectious disease that affects a person's organs and tissues that aid in breathing) in the facility. The facility failed to: 1. Minimize Resident 1's exposure to COVID-19. 2. Stock face shields in eight of eight isolation carts (storage unit for personal protective equipment [PPE, protective clothing or equipment designed to protect the wearer's body from infection, such as a gown, gloves, mask, and face shield]) designated for the COVID-19 positive and COVID-19 exposed rooms. 3. Ensure face shields were used by staff members prior to entering Residents 2 and 3 rooms, who were COVID-19 positive. 4. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Apr 1, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure doors remained closed to residents' rooms that tested positive for COVID-19 (highly contagious respiratory disease) for five of five sampled residents (Resident 6, Resident 7, Resident 8, Resident 9, and Resident 10). This deficient practice had the potential to expose all residents, staff, and visitors to COVID-19. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 6's Admission Record, dated 4/2/2024, the admission record indicated Resident 6 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses which included COVID-19, muscle weakness, acute kidney failure (the sudden and rapid loss of kidney's ability to filter waste and balance fluid in blood), type 2 diabetes… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF803Aug 27, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the standardized recipe for Spinach Au Gratin for five of five sampled residents (Residents 2, Resident 6, Resident 7, Resident 10 and Resident 98). This deficient practice had the potential for affecting the resident's meal satisfaction and risk for weight loss.Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 6/5/2018 and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM - a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), muscle weakness (loss of muscles strength), hypertensive chronic kidney disease and anemia a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Aug 27, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure opened and frozen bag of mixed vegetables and frozen turkey meatballs were covered and sealed. These deficient practices had the potential to place 90 of 96 medically compromised and vulnerable residents who received food from the kitchen at risk for compromised food integrity and contamination.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/2026 at 8:15 a.m. with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), in the kitchen, observed an opened bag of turkey meatballs in the freezer, not fully closed. An opened bag of mixed vegetables was observed in the freezer, not fully closed. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 165 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 27, 2026Standard15 findings
  • Jun 15, 2026Complaint4 findings
  • Dec 31, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • May 22, 2025Standard16 findings
  • Jan 15, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 26, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 16, 2024Infection control1 finding
  • May 31, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 26 earlier surveys
  • May 16, 2024Standard9 findings
  • Apr 1, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 4, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • Sep 28, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 8, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 15, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 23, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 17, 2022Standard8 findings
  • Nov 24, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 12, 2021Complaint4 findings
  • Mar 2, 2020Standard13 findings
  • Aug 29, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 26, 2019Standard6 findings
  • Jun 8, 2018Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Feb 25, 2018Standard13 findings
  • Feb 27, 2017Standard11 findings
  • Jan 30, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 21, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 15, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 14, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 12, 2016Standard12 findings
  • Aug 14, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 25, 2014—1 finding
  • Jul 26, 2013Standard8 findings
  • Apr 13, 2012—17 findings
  • Dec 23, 2010—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction